The person running the Falaah Research Foundation is Dr Fazal Ullah Chisti. Could not find the website
Most of Zameel's arguments are copy and paste from Dr Khalid's work. Some of these points are addressed on a website called 'Falaah' (don't know if it is still running). Brother the point I was trying to make was that this to and fro is just a case of going around in circles. Better off avoiding it because the actual solution (the one forwarded by Allamah Saeed Ahmad Asad) to the issue is not entertained because of self-serving reasons and a lack of objectivity.
http://sunniport.com/index.php?thre...-imam-fadl-e-haq-khayrabadi.14254/#post-66775 The reply to initial part of that article is linked above, otherwise it might be better to state which subject you want answers on.
This is old ground and you can see the points made by the deo have been responded to previously. However, I reiterate my support for the likes of Allamah Saeed Asad and their position on the issue. They have identified the core issues between our side and the deo side as being 3. 2 of them are results of claims from the deo side that the Sunni Brelwis are guilty of shirk and bida. The other issue is the one of takfir that the Sunni Brelwi scholars made against 4 deo elders. Allama Saeed Asad is willing to sit with deo representatives and objectively discuss these issues whereby an agreement is sought on the true nature of these core issues. This is the approach that can help bring about an end to this conflict. Claims and counter claims, and responses and counter responses unfortunately will just fan the sectionarism that both sides claim the other side is guilty of. Objectivity is the key in unlocking and exposing the dark reality that lies behind this conflict.
https://www.basair.net/sectarianism...dian-subcontinent-a-response-to-asrar-rashid/ Asalamu alaykum Could someone give an answer to this atrocity of an article?