Sadr Al Afadil Moulana Sayyid Na'im al-Din Muradabadi alaihi rahmah's At-Tahqiqat li Daf'i it-Talbisat has been translated in to English by Shaykh Abd Al Hadi Al Qadiri, the book is currently only available in South Africa from The Imam Ahmad Raza Academy, Durban.
the title of the thread is worng, these are not new, but century old cud they have been regurgitating shamelessly if really interested to know the answers then read following books, will add more books later. At Tabsheer bi Radi at Tahzeer (also in maqalaat e kazmi p317) - Allamah Ahmed Saeed Kazmi alaihi rahamah Khatm e Nubuwwat or Tahzir un Naas - Tabassum Shah Bukhari (must read) ibārāt e akābir kā taĥqīqī wa tanqīdī jāeyzah - vol 1 ibārāt e akābir kā taĥqīqī wa tanqīdī jāeyzah - vol 2 Nazriya Khatm-e-Nabowat Aur Tehzeer-un-Naas - Madani MiyaN -- and some refutations on aqaid. Hadyat'ul Ahbaab fi't Tasarrufati Ma Fauqa'l Asbaab - Haseen ud Din Shah (must read) TawDīh al-Bayān li Khazāyn al-Írfān - Ghulam Rasul Saeedi alaihi rahmah Gulshan-e-Tauheed o Risalat - Jild 001 Read | Download Gulshan-e-Tauheed o Risalat - Jild 002 Read | Download Ilm-e-Nabwi Aur Mutashabbihaat Read | Download Ilm-e-Nabwi Aur Munafiqeen Read |Download Huzoor (Sallallaho Alaihi Wasallam) Ka Badar Mein Faisla Hargiz Khata Nahi Read | Download ILme Nabwi Aur Umoore Duniya Read | Download
Hussam ul Haramain Kay 100 Saal: This is good work, answering some of their objections. For example it explains that the 3 statements found in tehzeerun nas are 3 separate kufr. http://www.alahazratnetwork.org/modules/worksonalahazrat/item.php?itemid=112 Think its page 16 or 17 where the discussion of tehzeerun nas begins.
Correction, Mawlana Hashmat Ali Khan's [rahimāhullah] refutation of Al-Muhānnad is called Ra'd ul-Muhānnad.
Brother, when do do you think the refutation of muhannad will be published, as I have heard it is in the pipeline, as evidenced by your comment above.
there is an agenda to remove all textual evidence of "deobandi-wahabi links", from works, especially abridged versions. Since most of these deo naqshis and what not, are financially successful and are either doctors or have good businesses, they have the means to increase there doctrine and attraction in the youth.
these have been answered in TKM in considerable detail; you just need to read it. more will come in sha'Allah, on their masterpiece of deceit and lies, they call muhannad. ---
Read The Preamble to Faith by abu Hasan which is the english translation to Tamhid ul Imaan of Ala'hāzrat.
Deobandi's need to change the record, same old pathetic and invalid objections, all of which have been answered again and again. 1] All the statements were kuffriyah, if seperated, the conclusion was the same [the context did not change] - I can assure you Shaykh Asrar did not 'agree' to it. 2] Imam Barzanji's disagreement with Ala'hazrat was on Ilm ul Ghayb [and the latter's work 'Al-dawlā tul'Makkiyāh] - not the deobandi issue. 3] This isnt even worth entertaining, so did 33 giants from the Haramain Sharifayn then... 4] No it wasn't, Deobandi's swindled their way out of it by presenting to the Ulema of Makkah/Madina lies about their real beleifs in their infamous work 'al-Muhannad' which was refuted by Mawlana Hashmat Ali Khan [rahimāhullah] in his work 'Al-sawārimul Hindiyyāh]
Assalamualaykum, Recently, came across few allegations by Deoband scholars/students on facebook. Though the post has been deleted, would appreciate if learned brothers can shed some light on them. 1) The Kufria statements of deobandi elders were taken out of context and 3 statements were picked from different texts then combined and presented (It seems even brother Asrar Rashid also agreed to it) 2) Shaykh Sayyid Ahmad al-Barzanji's opinion on Shah Ahmad rida khan (RahimuAllah) 3) Alahadhrat misunderstood/misinterpreted the texts of deobandi elders 4) Husam al-Haramaiyn was revoked/recalled by Ulema-e-Arab would appreciate if Brothers Abu hasan and Mohammad Aqdas could give objective points on these points obviously backed by texts Ma'salam
