Shaykh Yaqubi meets Mufti Aslam

mufti aslam sahib's ardent praise of yaqubi sahib reminds me of a joke i have mentioned before.

four men were praying on the riverside and a fish was washed on the bank.
one said: 'look there is fish'
the other said: 'don't you know that you shouldn't talk while you are in prayer?'
the third said: 'the first one talked, alright. but why did YOU speak?'
the imam said: 'alHamdulillah, i did not talk'.

----

 

it looks like all of these people have forgotten that Allah ta'ala is Ever-Watching, All-Knowing.

media circus to fool unsuspecting common folk.

 

in case anyone didn't know, the kafir* and munafiq, mark "ibn salool" hanson is a CONTRIBUTOR to 'the study Quran'. he will cry crocodile tears and say he isn't a perennialist, but he is an out and out perennialist who has ZILCH to do with Islam or Muslims, absolutely no different than the kafir sayi nashr.

(*i am calling mark hanson aka hamza yusuf a kafir and munafiq in full consciousness and with full personal responsibility in front of Allah, based on how I know my deen and what i have seen of him on various media outlets (almost all digital). please do not edit my post, and leave my case to Allah. i however, will not hold someone in contempt who wishes to resort to silence over this dajjal, mark hanson, until he/she discusses all of hanson's activities and details with an upright scholar of the Ahlus Sunnah)

the dajjal has penned down a roughly 39 pages long essay titled "Death, Dying, and the Afterlife in the Quran"

this is an excerpt from the said essay, and is being cited in accordance with the "right to quote". (the devils are incredibly touchy feely about copyright infringement as stated in the beginning of their 'tahreef in translation' project)

this is just a random sample of "ibn salool" hanson doing his best to sow doubts and destroy people's faiths. but of course, didn't he also state the "opinion" of the bulk majority of scholars? the rest of the "essay" is also full of many 'clever' implications that swing both ways to us as well as them. for example, a "Muslim" mentioned in an Arabic matn may be very sweetly translated to "person" in english, to turn some context on its head. don't have the time for a full autopsy of his filthy essay.

the kind of kafirs he co-authors with, include dajjals like joeseph lumbard, who has penned down an essay titled "The Quranic View of Sacred History and Other Religions". an excerpt from the said blasphemous essay says this:

اشهد ان لا اله الا الله واشهد ان محمدا عبده ورسوله

may Allah forgive me and accept my renewal of Eiman for citing these two dajjals and their blasphemous work, though it is only for the purpose of warning Muslim brothers and sisters against these shayateen and rebuking the dajjals and their blasphemous book.

 

Mufti Aslam Bandyalvi has lavishly praised Shaykh Yaqoubi in the clip which is now being advertised all over facebook (please see attached). Sadly Mufti Sahib has done this before and stated Tajdid has been done in Coventry.

‘Shaykh Yaqubi lectured on Perennialism’ is a bit misleading. The ‘Imam of ahl Sunnah’ would not need to be lectured on Perennialism or need to be told about his association with Hamza Yusuf as the graphics of the clip allude to.

Would it not have been better to have take the bull by the horns and lectured on the issue of ‘the Study Quran’ and Perennialism and demanded clear stances on these issues before endorsements and explicitly stating the Deen is strengthened by the said individual. If the Shayukh have wrote verdicts and works on Perennialism they should be published just like the refutation of ISIS and the Tafzili fitna has been published