Mawlana @abu Hasan Why do they need an 'ijmah' to say individual Qadiyanis are kāfir? Where do they draw the line? According to them, are individual Sikhs non-takfirable because someone somewhere may have written a book saying their Guru Nanak was a Muslim and attended the Hajj? How about the Druze. What about the so-called 'Hussaini Brahmins', about whom [naql i kufr, kufr na bashad] some say: "Wah Dutt Sultan, Hindu ka dharm, Musalman ka iman, Adha Hindu adha Musalman.’" Does he hesitate to consider every individual follower of Musaylimah al-Kaddhāb a kāfir too? Or how about the so-called "Atheist Muslim"? Perhaps he hesitates on that one too. In fact, what does Jurjis even have to say about Maʿlūm min ad-Dīn bi-Ḍarūrah? Would someone saying they are Muslim while openly rejecting every other tenet of the faith still come within his nuance?