Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Refutation' started by SunniRadawi, Feb 5, 2020.
Shaykh Ninowy talks about his criticism on the hadith of 73 sects a few months back in Cape Town.
COURT PAPERS PDF attached.
It's a pdf but the file extension was removed for some reason. I simply added .pdf to the filename and it worked for me.
Brother PDF is large file
Use this link
It clearly shows that the mans on drugs that hazrat hamza rad gave him isharat to make a masjid with riba
About time he was exposed
Wasalaam, can you please post the document as a PDF? Can't open the file in link
Correction: the applicant's husband is Ibrahim Hussain Chisti.
The alleged complainant isn't off scott free either. He was an Imam at a 'Barelvi' Masjid in the GTA for some time. As it turns out he too had Deo sympathies.
Everything happens for a reason, Alhamdulillah now we have actual evidence , my summary was wrong but it wasn't meant as a vindication rather proper protocol until further evidence was /is brought out.
It seems like his former student from Canada is taking him court for abuse of power and being a fraud
Always knew there was something fishy about him
Here is the link to the official court papers
https://archive.org/download/ScanRe...812/Scan - Reply Affidavit of Ibrahim Hussain
Document attached but I do not think your summary is correct.
He retracts antroporphic believe and says it's kufr in his commentary of Aqidah tahawiya...although I think he mis- translated Tashbih as Anthropomorphism when tajsim is anthropomorphism
In all honesty, all the points brought up in both sources all seem to be among the domain of scholastic dispute, I am not endorsing him but clearly through "his ijtihad (I'm using this term loosely) be it weak according to our pious predecessors and majority of ahlul sunnah, along with his other historical depiction of ummayad (post khilafat rashida till and including the Abbasid)anti-ahlul bayt agenda, that is something agreeable and open to interpretation.
I remember there being an meeting in South Africa upon Sh Ninowy's visit(posted here ~ but please correct me if I'm wrong), where The Scholars of Ahlul Sunnah discoursed and Sh Ninowy retracted/repented from the problematic beliefs And this assembly was dates recently (much later than these sources mentioned by our brothers here).
What i'm saying is the methodology of digging in the past history and statements of people and incorrect belief, pre-repentance, is not an appropriate methodology to adhere to, everyone deserve a chance of a clean slate, and the mercy of the Prophet ﷺ is embodied by Ahlul Sunnah Wal Jama'at.
This is neither an endorsement, nor a vindication of this scholar in specific, rather my comment on the bleakness of comments made out of the zeal and mahabbah of Ahlul Sunnah, but this approach is acceptable/understandable from qualified individuals (the ulama and advance students knowledge here), but detrimental and disconnected with the demeanor of students of Ahlul Sunnah, more specifically those who claim to be on a path of tariqah or tasawwuf.
Authored by Ninowy on tahawi aqida... look at point 144...he translated tashbih as Anthropomorphism...to my knowledge this in incorrect
check this out
Posted as Received
Please repost to all contacts to create an awareness of this fitna taking place in our Sunni Institutions
*Many corrupt "sheikhs", "Mufti's" and "Huffaaz" are getting together this Ramadan in Cape Town *
Members of the khateeb family from Durban have brought a great ruin to the belief system of the Sunni Muslim community of South Africa. Hafiz mahmood khateeb from Cape Town with the help of some corrupt sheikhs, muftis and Moulanas have managed to convince some Sunni Muslims to accommodate the Shias and wahabis and encouraged them to perform Salah behind these insulters and open enemies of Allah and His Rasool Salallahu alayhi wasallam. Hafiz Ahmed khateeb in Jhb has corrupted many Sunni families in theSandton area. His influence has caused some Sunni families to become the mureeds of a hidden shia sheikh ninowy. He leads Salah in a Sunni jamaat khana in sandton , destroying the Salaah of true Sunni Muslims. One of their brothers was recently moving around with tahirul padari's son, doing his bit to corrupt the Aqeeda of theSunnis in Durban, as his brothers have done in Cape Town and Jhb. Their grand father Moulana khateeb took Sunni children and sent them to deoband to study. Perhaps this is why the khateeb family is like this.
A branch of Darul Uloom Pretoria in Cape Town running under the supervision of the Ziaee brothers (CTIEC) is also playing an active role to corrupt Sunniyyat. They collect Zakaat, Lillah and Fitra from Sunnis ( THEY USE THE NAME OF SHAH HASEENUDIN - RAWALPINDI) but entertain tahirul qadiri's, Sh ninowy's and the ignorant sheikh owaisi missions.THEY ALSO OPENLY SUPPORT PADRI EVENTS ESPECIALLY WHEN THE SON OF TAGHOOT/PADRI CAME TO VISIT SOUTH AFRICA!
Sunni Muslims are requested to stay far away from mufti monkey, shake ninowy, shake owaisi and their facilitators and supporters like the khateeb brothers, CTIEC and some businessmen from PTA and Jhb who were Sunnis but are now funding corruption. Safeguard your Imaan. Do not follow attention seekers, the rich and the arrogant. Remain steadfast on the pure Aqeeda of Ahlus Sunnah wal Jamaat.
A concerned Sunni
Is that uff to Sunni Islam or to the zanjeers
On the page mentioned above of the very same Fatāwā ‘Ālamgīrīyah, there is a quotation from Fatāwā Ẓahīriyah:
“The refuter of Imāmah of Sayyidunā Abū Bakr (may Almighty Allah be pleased with him) is a Kāfir, and according to the sayings of some theologian, he is a Badmazhab not a Kāfir. And the correct verdict is that he is a Kāfir. Similarly, according to the most correct verdict, the refuter of the Khilāfah of Sayyidunā ‘Umar Farūq is also a Kāfir.
[Barjandī Sharh Niqāyah, Volume 4, Page 2, Lucknow
“If someone denies any of the necessities of the religion, then he is Kāfir (disbeliever). For instance, to say that Almighty Allah is like the physical bodies, or to refuse the companionship of Sayyidunā Siddīq.”
[Durr al-Mukhtār, Page 64, Maṭba’a Hāshamī]
It is stated:
“(وكذااختلافته) similarly, the refusal of his Khilāfah is also Kufr (disbelief)”.
[Taḥṭawī Ḥāshiyah Durr, Volume 1, Page 244, Egypt]
It is stated:
“If a Raafzee perceives Sayyidunā ‘Alī superior than all companions (may Almighty Allah be pleased with them), then he is innovator and deviant and if he is the denier of Khilafat of Sayyidunā Abū Bakr, May Almighty Allah be pleased with him, then he is Kafir.”
[Fatāwā Khulāṣah Qalamī, Kitāb aṣ-Ṣalāh, Section 15
Khizānat al-Muftīn Qalamī, Kitāb aṣ-Ṣalāh, Section Fī Man yaṣiḥḥ al-iqutidā bihī wa man lā yasiḥḥu]
It is mentioned:
“Amongst the Rawāfiḍ, if there is someone who says that Sayyidunā ‘Alī is superior to the three Caliphs, he is a deviant. And if he refuses the Khilāfah of Sayyidunā Abū Bakr aṣ-Ṣiddīq and Sayyidunā ‘Umar Farooq (may Almighty Allah be pleased with them) then he is a Kāfir.”
[Fatḥ al-Qadīr Sharḥ Hidāyah, Volume 1, Page 248, Egypt.]
[Ḥāshiyah Tabyīn al-‘Allāmah Ahmad ash-Shalbī, Volume 1, Page 135, Egypt.]
It is also stated:
(من انكر خلافۃ ابى بكررضى الله تعالٰى عنه فهو كافر فى الصحيح و من انكر خلافۃ عمررضى الله تعالٰى عنه فهو كافر فى الاصلاح)
“The refuter of Khilāfah of Sayyidunā Abū Bakr (may Almighty Allah be pleased with him) is a Kāfir. This is the correct verdict. And the refuter of the Khilāfah of Sayyidunā ‘Umar Farūq (may Almighty Allah be pleased with him) is also a Kāfir. This is the most correct judgment.”
[Wajīz Imām Kardari, Volume 3, Page 318, Egypt.]