You can have your differences but what a cowardly thing to ban a person because you cannot answer his post. Is it not better to reply evidence with evidence instead of banning and calling people names (typical abu H trait when he has no answers). If gg has committed a bannable offence then what is to say of the list of sahaba and salaf that called him maloon (accursed)? Some people like to follow a discussion and in the first half of the thread there were only selected points made by users and the molana saheb in the speech, as soon as a fuller picture emerges a user gets banned. If you have the stronger evidences then don't be afraid to let people make their minds up instead of zapping user accounts. Ridiculous.