If those who accuse Jalali sahib of blasphemy can explain this page of Pir Mihr Ali, we should get somewhere.
*Just to clarify by mentioning they, I mean it is the Shia who negate the possibility of Khata e Ijtihadi for the Ahle Bayt
I am not a fan of Mufti Sahib's style to be honest but both they and Mufti Aslam Bandyalwi raised a critical point in light of Pir sahib's Tasviya. Pir Sahib is refuting the Shia definition of Ma'soomiyat where they negate Khata e Ijtihadi for the Ahle Bayt. This is further proof that Jalali Sahib did mean Khata e Ijtihadi in their original statement. It is no surprise that the two aforementioned scholars, who actually analysed the context (Pir sahib's text), have exonerated Jalali Sahib of the charge of Gustakhi. This is why Shah Sahib played foul and demanded Jalali Sahib only quote the Khair ul Quroon because if they analysed Pir Sahib's statements then a state visit to Golra Sharif would be denied. I mentioned this before that if the opposition were sincere they would analyse Jalali sahib's statement in light of Pir Sahib's book and decide where or if Jalali sahib has erred.
Mufti Fazl Chishti exposing baatil shia beliefs regarding the Prophets, ahl ul-bayt, sahaba. Video 1 on "classical" shia scholars/books: Video 2 on modern shia swines: He also mentions which sections of penal code, 295C etc., can be applied to shias