Ammar Nakshawani

Discussion in 'General Topics' started by Umer97, Nov 7, 2016.

Draft saved Draft deleted
  1. Nawazuddin

    Nawazuddin Veteran

    This guy is an akhbari shiah and even usuli shiah's call him a Dog so you can imagine how khabeeth he is.
    Ahmet Tayfur likes this.
  2. Umer97

    Umer97 Student of Knowledge

    Below is their statement

    Last week Sheikh Asrar Rashid issued at challenge to the Shia Ulema based in the West to debate him. I hereby accept the challenge. Having previously debated and destroyed a plethora of Bakri titans via TV debates, I'll happily do the same with you. I'm based in the USA so therefore fulfill your requirement that the scholar be from the West. As the debate will need to be via satellite I'm happy for it to be aired live for all to see. We can show it concurrently on my Ahlelbayt TV channel and whatever Bakri channel (using your facebook live or any other means of live streaming) you want to show it on. So Sheikh Asrar, I am here, ready, willing and able.

    Now all that's left is for us to agree the conditions of the debate on the uprightness of the Sheikhayn (Abu Bakr, Umar, A'isha ) and all other companions who deviated from the path of Allah (swt). I'll look forward to hearing from you in due course.

    Note: Unknown to me, I had incorrectly referred to you as Ansar Rashid, I apologize for that error.
  3. Umer97

    Umer97 Student of Knowledge

    A shia from USA accepted Shaykh Asrars challenge.
  4. Harris786

    Harris786 Veteran

    It seems that Ammar is hiding away from debating the claims that he made regarding the noble shaykhayn in public. Yet he is not able to defend his claims in public like a real academic.The Rawafid are claiming that other clerics are ready to debate me regarding the nobility of the shaykhayn and the mother of the believers (Allah be well pleased with them). The Rawafid have shown their true colours by openly insulting the companions and the household, the wives of the Prophet of Allah (Allah bless him and grant him peace). Those Rawafid who claim they do not insult the noble companions are also supporting the foul mouthed Yasir alHabib.

    So I announce to the entire Rafidi/ Twelver cult in the western world that I accept your challenge to a public debate with all your clerics. You can bring all of them. Whoever you bring will be representing the entire Twelver religion. My position is the shaykhayn were upon truth loving of Mawla Ali (radiy Allahu anhu) and the wives of the Prophet (Allah bless him and grant him peace) were pure; while the Rawafid are not the true supporters of the pure house of the holy Prophet ( Allah bless him and grant him peace) and distort the history of Islam.

    The venue will be a public place followed by a mubahala.

    The Rawafid should take note that we are upon the aquida of Ibn Hajar Haytami, Nur alDin Zengi and Salah alDin Ayyubi who subjugated Rafidis as with the will of Allah we will do also.

    I will be announcing a public venue, date and time within a week.

    Get your mullas and 'ayatollahs ' ready for the big debate and challenge.
  5. Ahmet Tayfur

    Ahmet Tayfur New Member

    Yes brother Aqdas it is him. He speaks some mashed up Urdu and throws in some English for added measure.
    Ghulam Ali likes this.
  6. Aqdas

    Aqdas Staff Member

    Is it really?? :)

    I never clocked that.
  7. Ahmet Tayfur

    Ahmet Tayfur New Member

    I think he should do into dramatic acting especially with his performance at the end after spouting all his filth. Maybe even get an oscar nomination for actor in a supporting role.

    on a side a note anyone who has viewed the Karbala series on ummah channel ever noted that a caller by thee name of Dr W Khan is the khabeeth Murtada Khan
  8. Harris786

    Harris786 Veteran

    Dr Ammar is hiding under the pretense that he is a 'historian' and not a debater. We can debate his paradigm of Islamic history. However Ammar knows his Rafidi epistemology of history is flawed and full of incoherence. I will show him the inconsistencies of his story. If he refuses to debate let him say this on record and have someone represent him. I will only take serious your official statement and not your trolls posting in the comments.

    - Shaykh Asrar Rashid
  9. Harris786

    Harris786 Veteran

  10. abu Hasan

    abu Hasan Administrator

    we are not afraid because we can not only read tabari and other sunni books, but can also catch the thief and thrash him...even if he is a PhD holder.
  11. abu Hasan

    abu Hasan Administrator

    as such, i have a very low opinion of mere degree holders; and i consider the present education system as practically useless.

    but that is not the point. if such 'quite educated' people genuflect upon the name of PhD alone without merit in their argument, they are uneducated degree-holders.
    Bazdawi and Harris786 like this.
  12. abu Hasan

    abu Hasan Administrator

    what is there to mock?

    don't you read? he got a PhD in disparaging hazrat muawiyah.
    the point is not mocking his qualifications but simply that getting a PhD does not make him an authority; and in our times, it does not indicate erudition. read the links i have provided to see how rotten academia is these days.

    strange accusation.
    some tattoo prince got a PhD from some bible school on a thesis that disparages hazrat muawiyah. am sorry, i am not cowed by PhDs and degrees and chairs - i will give respect to an illiterate peasant if he makes a valid point, and won't mind rubbishing a PhD if he talks nonsense. the merit is in the validity of the idea - not just bowing down to a PhD or a 'chair'.
    Bazdawi, Ghulam Ali and Harris786 like this.
  13. by 'neutral' i mean people who are born in Muslim households -- whether Sunni, Shia or Wahabi -- and identify as Muslims but don't know much about Islam other than maybe the 5 pillars - but are quite educated in a secular sense (i.e. university or postgrad etc.)
  14. that's why people check where your qualifications are from. fake PhDs like aamir liaquat, for example, get easily found out if you purchase your PhD online by paying a few grand!

    Please don't let your aqidah effect your sense of fairness. Nakshawani is a bigoted Rafidi but that doesn't make everything he says wrong or his qualifications worthless. Debates are useless for this reason that Sunnis will insist Shaykh Asrar won Shias will say the same thing. Neutral people -- and they do exist!-- will actually look at the arguments presented and what I'm afraid will happen is Nakhsawani will quote things from Tabari and other Sunni books (as he did in the lecture linked above which caused Shaykh Asrar to give his challenge).

  15. You know I am not a fan of him but to mock his academic qualifications is just childish.

    Let's see if he does debate shaykh asrar.
  16. abu Hasan

    abu Hasan Administrator

    to titillate a shia audience, all he has to to do is bad mouth the sahabah to send them in a frenzy - the morons will tear their clothes and act like a bunch of monkeys. who cares if a million morons watch his videos? a group of million morons is still moronic. mere numbers won't make them an intelligent audience.

    bill o'reilly may probably have a bigger audience that noam chomsky - but that doesn't make the former an intellectual.

    even if he has half a dozen PhDs.
    Harris786 likes this.
  17. abu Hasan

    abu Hasan Administrator

    if these imaginary 'neutrals' are so dumb that and stupid that the mere name of PhD makes them faint, then there is no point appealing to their intelligence. they simply have none.

    all one has to do is get a PhD from some online uni paying a few thousand bucks and shove it in their faces: 'look i am a PhD. shut up and listen to all i say.'

    this imaginary constituency is so dumb that they need not attend shaykh asrar's events as they won't understand a thing.
    Bazdawi likes this.
  18. just watch any of his videos and the audience is overwhelmingly young people of uni going age. same for imam asim hussain.

    you don't get millions of youtube views if you don't appeal to the young, internet-savvy generations.
    i doubt if elderly shias in lucknow or tehran or london are his primary watchers on youtube!
  19. you might not and other on here might not but if there is a debate between shaykh asrar and nakshawani, the general audience or 'neutrals' definitely will.

    That's something we need to bear in mind.
  20. abu Hasan

    abu Hasan Administrator

    that is an opinion. qualify it with evidence, if you want to call it fact.
    Noori and Harris786 like this.

Share This Page