Aqdas facebook posts

Discussion in 'General Topics' started by Khanah, Feb 5, 2021.

Draft saved Draft deleted
  1. Khanah

    Khanah Well-Known Member

    To be fair, a lot of the scholars can't recite with tajweed. It would eliminate a large swathe of them, which I think is fair enough. Not sure how someone can be a scholar with next to 0 effort to correct his own tajweed but that's beyond my pay grade anyway. I've always just found it absurd that someone who doesn't know basics is apparently a scholar.

    Kind of like how I find it absurd that we have so called sufi shuyukh that are obese yet I thought zuhd was supposed to be a thing (not talking about those who have illnesses, can't walk, and the like). Apparently you can be a sufi getting fat from 2 khatams a day and you can be a scholar whilst you don't know that there's supposed to be a different qaaf and kaaf.

    On a personal note, I find it hard to follow such people so I don't.

    Good posts bro
  2. Aqdas

    Aqdas Staff Member

    Everyone who is known as a pir or scholar should be tested:

    1. Read the Quran with tajwid
    2. Pass a basic aqidah exam
    3. Pass a basic fiqh exam
    4. Confirm his view on qadiyanis, wahabis, devbandis, rafidis, tafdilis, et al
    5. Confirm that Islam is the only true religion that leads to eternal salvation

    These are basics. No one should be on a Sunni platform who can't do this.
  3. Aqdas

    Aqdas Staff Member

    There should be conditions for allowing someone on a Sunni stage.

    The man must:

    1. Affirm Sunni aqidah
    2. Be able to read Quran such that his prayer is valid
    3. Have a full fist beard if he's hanafi
    4. Not have a hairstyle that opposes the sunnah
    5. Not be partaking in singing songs
    6. Not share stages with deviants
    7. Not promote deviants
    8. Not celebrate Christmas, Easter, etc.
    9. Not be an open sinner

    Every person should be tested.

    If a man can't do this, he mustn't be allowed anywhere near the mic. If he's so hungry for it, tell him use YouTube, not a Sunni stage.
  4. Aqdas

    Aqdas Staff Member

    Look at the nasheed artists of today and then consider WHY our ulama forbade qawwali with instruments.

    They were wise. They knew the doors it opens.
    Those who allow instruments, are you now alright with these popstar naat khwans doing what they do in the name of Islam?

    Fiqh is wisdom. Not just bookish knowledge.
  5. Abdullah Ahmed

    Abdullah Ahmed Well-Known Member

    With regards to Sul-kulli:

    Some of you may have been following the news with regards to Muhammad Bilal Khan who was killed in Islamabad about a week ago. Even though he seemed like he "did great work" and was "a great person" because he appeared to be at the forefront of the Namoos-e-risalat issue in Pakistan, in his other posts and videos, he openly claimed deobandiyyat.

    Although I disagreed with Dr Asif Jalali with his split from Allamah Khadim, and I sided with Allamah Khadim sahib, I feel more inclined to siding with Dr Asif Jalali on the "Muhamamd Bilal Khan" issue.

    I appreciate the brothers' feedback and thoughts.
  6. Aqdas

    Aqdas Staff Member

    In terms of converting Sunnis to their baseless ideology, wahabis and deobandis have inflicted more damage than rafidis but as for infiltrating their dogmas amongst Sunnis, rafidis have done more.

    Can't we see:

    - saying Sayyidah and Sayyiduna for sahabah is questioned by Sunnis
    - praising and holding urs of Amir Muawiyah is opposed by "Sunnis"
    - remembrances for Imam Husayn but not for Imam Hasan is done by Sunnis
    - accepting Mawla Ali as superior being a valid belief is held by "Sunnis"
    - critiquing sahabah is done by "Sunnis"
    - opposing slogans of the four greatest sahabah is done by "Sunnis"

    Rafidis have had a lot of success spreading their creed amongst us.

    We need to awaken, recognise these influences and remove them from our ranks.
  7. Aqdas

    Aqdas Staff Member

    O Abu Layth! When will world peace ensue? When the whole world accepts the shariah of RasulAllah ﷺ! Isa alayhis salam came 2,000 years ago but it's only when he tells people he follows the shariah of Muhammad RasulAllah ﷺ that the entire earth will accept the true faith.

    How did you figure that this necessitates Isa alayhis salam being superior to RasulAllah ﷺ...?

    It's exactly the opposite. It proves the superiority of RasulAllah ﷺ once again.
    Ghulam Ali likes this.
  8. Harris786

    Harris786 Veteran

    du'a for mawlana aqdas is son - may Allah subhanahu wa ta'ala grant his son complete recovery and return him home to his family.
    Umar99 likes this.
  9. Aqib alQadri

    Aqib alQadri Veteran

    The ulema of yore were indeed much more Allah-fearing; we now have just a handful of those.

    majority today lack the guts, and are distracted by various other goals.
    Umar99 likes this.
  10. Aqdas

    Aqdas Staff Member

    Have you considered this?

    The lack of activity against The Study Quran and Tahir ul shows the immense veracity of the fatawa in Husam al-Haramayn.

    How, you ask? Why am I connecting the two?

    Well, Husam al-Haramayn contains fatawa of kufr against five kafirs from thirty-three leading scholars of Arab Sharif.

    Conversely, how many refutations from leading authorities have we had against The Study Quran or Tahir...? A handful...?

    This shows that attaining fatawa from ulama is no mean feat.

    So what it does emphatically prove is that those 33 ulama in Husam al-Haramayn were fully convinced of the kufr of the five kafirs.

    This is despite Husam al-Haramayn being over 100 years ago where there was no mass communication. Today it is much easier to investigate but scholars still lag...

    This doesn't mean The Study Quran doesn't contain kufr. It absolutely does! The point of the post is to show that many ulama won't issue a verdict of kufr even when it's more apparent than the midday sun yet a whole 33 ulama attested to the kufr of devbandis which shows how clear their kufr is!
    Aqib alQadri likes this.
  11. Unbeknown

    Unbeknown Senior Moderator

    astaghfirullah a thousand times.

    this "shaykh" is telling us that defending the tanzeeh of Allah ta'ala from the attacks of the heretics is same as "discussing refined theological issues inside the closed doors of a mosque" and should therefore take a back seat in our attempts to battle social waywardness.

    this is not speech of a scholar, it is the speech of an ignorant and materialist social activist with debilitating myopia and a misplaced zeal. Fie upon such scholars.

    he is warning us that if didn't prioritize issues his way, we will have these ills plague our own homesteads.

    thanks for your concern but no thanks.

    We look to Allah subHanu wa ta'ala as our Guide and Protector and that of our future generations. We refuse to relegate education about His dhaat and sifaat to some unspecified future time when society shall have been cured of all its ills. We believe in a holistic education with an aqida-first approach as has been the way of the Ahlussunnah across generations.

    Trivialising aqida issues with word games might be your forte, calling your bluff is ours.

    alHamdulillahi 'ala zaalik wa huwa ni'mal wakeel.
    Aqdas likes this.
  12. Aqdas

    Aqdas Staff Member

    Dear scholars,

    When you speak, always consider the laity (awaam). Give them an inch and they'll take a mile.

    When you talk about the priorities of ulama AND THEN conflate social ills with aqidah ones and PRIORITISE social problems whilst downplaying core aqidah points - what will the layman take away?

    Exactly that anyone who now talks about these aqidah issues is not with the times!

    You're giving a heyday to sulh kullis. Those that fail to recognise deobandis as being outside Ahlu's Sunnah will share your words endlessly as you've given them ample ammunition.

    If you want to highlight social ills, do so. We all should, nay, MUST. But where's your wisdom that the Qur'an calls for? You're preaching to awaam, don't forget. They'll take your conflation and shout: 'no more need to defend that Allah ta'ala is free from falsehood. Shaykh said we must talk about drugs and alcohol instead.'

    This is typical filibuster.

    And if you must compare, why use those examples that are from the necessities of Ahlu's Sunnah? Why couldn't you talk about actual secondary and tertiary issues? Why didn't you say: 'there's a bigger priority to tackle social ills than debate about raf' al-yadayn.'

    (And by the way, don't prioritise it, but do tell us your views on deobandis who to this day write and believe lying is included within Divine Power. Take your time, don't prioritise).

    Also, do tell us what's more important: aqidah or actions? Is it acceptable that a man believes lying to be included within Divine Power but he stays away from drugs and alcohol?

    Are only societal ills ills? Aren't aqidah ills ills?

    Like I said, no one is saying highlighting societal ills isn't important. But there are ways to do it. Creating a standoff between aqidah and social ills truly downplays obligatory aqidah points.

    A better statement would be:

    'Use your jumu'ah khutbah effectively. Alongside critical aqidah points such as refuting the mutazilite heresy that Allah ta'ala can lie and which deobandis have revived and that believing Ali to be superior to Abu Bakr is innovation - our khatibs should also use the 52 Friday's in a year to highlight drug problems, alcohol, fornication, gambling. These societal ills surround us and plague every other Muslim home.

    Atheism, Darwinism, perennialism, sulh kullism are also rife. Our khatibs should highlight these too.

    Use the 52 weeks to cover as many pressing issues as possible.'

    See, with the above, nothing is downplayed. Sulh kullis don't have a field day. Simultaneously, those khatibs who never touch on drugs and alcohol are also given a shake up whilst the primary importance of aqidah is maintained.

    Allah ta'ala grant us wisdom.
    Allah ta'ala Knows best.

    Attached Files:

    Aqib alQadri and Unbeknown like this.
  13. Ridawi78692

    Ridawi78692 Hanafi Maturidi Qadri

    All the posts of Honourable brother Aqdas should be compiled into a book.

    They are very good and present the teachings of the Ahlu Sunnah in a very simplified and constructive manner.

    May Allah Azzawajal bless brother Aqdas for the work he is doing for the Deen and the Ahlu Sunnah.
  14. Aqdas

    Aqdas Staff Member

    The accusation we get a lot is that you only take from subcontinent scholars. You don't accept any of the Arab ulama.

    Oh, yeh?

    Then who's Shaykh Sayid Fodeh?

    His post regarding deeming Christians to be polytheists is coolness to the eyes in our times of darkness.

    It's not about Arab and non-Arab. It's about who sticks to the ijma'a of Ahlu's Sunnah and abides by akhlaq al-ulama.
    Noori, Ridawi78692 and Bazdawi like this.
  15. Aqdas

    Aqdas Staff Member

    The cumulative sin of every dog of hell who is attacking Amīr Muawiyah is upon those speakers who have created negativity regarding this blessed companion.

    People like Tahir ul, Abdul Qadir, Haroon Rashid have created and exacerbated this menace and will face the consequences on judgement day.

    It's become so bad that people have become bold enough to post their opposition to Amīr Muawiyah knowing there won't be much reprisal.

    My respect to those Sunnis who spoke out. We can't just leave it to ulama. Some might not know of the fitnah online and others may not want to get involved. So Sunni public also have a role to play.

    Those few ulama who do speak out, utmost respect.

    What Sunnis must do:

    1. Don't like any post that is negative towards Amīr Muawiyah
    2. Unfriend the poster
    3. If you see other Sunnis liking, warn them

    I speak out to defend Hazrat Muawiyah because I have no reputation to guard. I don't have to worry about who I'll upset if I speak bluntly. I'd rather face my beloved RasulAllah ﷺ with him knowing I did my little bit to defend his sahabi.

    رضي الله عنه
    Noori, Ridawi78692 and Aqib alQadri like this.

  16. There's teaching the Qur'an properly and taking time and then there's this disease where parents don't even send their kids to learn the Holy Qur'an in the first place. I have seen this become more prevalent and it only hits home when lo and behold one day the person gets hit with a difficulty he can't resolve easily like Sihr, Ain etc Then he holds his head in his hands thinking he doesn't know how to read the Verses of the Holy Qur'an. Parents should think and think ahead....act responsibly
    Ghulam Ali and Noori like this.
  17. Aqdas

    Aqdas Staff Member

    My dear Sunni teachers of Qur'an!

    Teach the qayidah well. VERY well. Do NOT move a student to the next page until s/he has mastered the current page.

    Yes, you'll be spending a relatively long time on qayidah and students and/or parents might even complain about the slow pace but take my word, it's worth it.

    Explain to them why you're not rushing.

    In the long run, you'll see it pay off. Would you rather a student struggles to read Qur'an all their life because they were rushed during qayidah or do qayidah once, properly, and find Qur'an recitation easy...

    Be very strict. Don't let mistakes off. E.g. if a qāf is pronounced as kāf, stop the student. Very soon they'll realise and rectify.

    Mark my words. They will come to the end of a rigorous qayidah training and then...

    ...they'll start reading the Qur'an by themselves!
    N-Sunni and Noori like this.
  18. Noori

    Noori Senior Moderator

    one should read, memorise, and understand Quran and hadith as much as possible. So, one also needs to learn arabic language.

    When a person reads and understands Quran, he talks with Allah subhA'anu wa ta'ala, and when a person reads and understands hadith, he listens to (or talks with) RasulAllah alaihi afDalus salaat wat-tasleem.

    this will inrease wisdom.
  19. Aqib alQadri

    Aqib alQadri Veteran

    It is mentioned in Shifa Shareef:
    Whoever believes in the Oneness of Allah and in Prophet-hood, and (also) bears witness to the Prophet-hood of Hazrat Mohammed (Allah’s blessings and peace be upon him), but also (simultaneously) believes that the prophets could have possibly lied - although he may claim some sort of logic behind it, by his own rationale - is, by consensus, a disbeliever.

    (Also quoted by Ala Hazrat in Al'Soo wa alIqaab Ala alMaseehi alKazzab)
    Last edited: Mar 14, 2017
    N-Sunni, Aqdas and Noori like this.
  20. Aqdas

    Aqdas Staff Member

    When one reads Imam Bajuri's monograph on essential Islamic creed, you will notice point number 42 mentions 'sidq' (truthfulness) as being a necessary (wajib) attribute of Prophets.

    What is wajib, it's opposite is muhal (impossible).

    Notice, Ahlu's Sunnah believe lying is impossible even for the Prophets, never mind our Lord Himself!

    Whereas devbandis and their flag bearers like Nuh Keller and Faraz Rabbani admit the possibility of falsehood even in divine speech!

    We seek the refuge of Allah!
    Aqib alQadri and Noori like this.

Share This Page