What a joke of an article, BMF certaintly dont represent me and like i said in my earlier post, the non-government sponsored thought process is what is attacked, whereas BMF unsurprisingly enough do receive government funding: http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/corporate/pdf/987573.pdf
This is the BMF stance in support of the ban. Some of the evidence as proof of him being a terrorist is really embarassing as a Sunni who these ppl supposedly represent: http://inayatscorner.files.wordpress.com/2010/06/bmf-press-release-22-june-2010.pdf
"The home secretary can stop people entering the UK if she believes there is a threat to national security, public order or the safety of citizens. That includes banning people if she believes their views glorify terrorism, promote violence or encourage other serious crime. However, somebody cannot be banned just for having opinions that other people would find offensive. " http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/10357263.stm Stupid people, if they thought he was that bad they wouldnt Peace TV air in the UK! Its all political, part of the process of attacking any muslim with independant non-government approved thought.
So the home sec decided to finally ban him amid pressure from the likes of EDL et al. I know many a sunni will have re-joiced at this but i think this is another example of the "you're with us or against us" mentality of the western governments.
The problem is that people dont look at the reporter, they see that it is The Times which is publishing this article. This article is typical of the views of the kuffar towards practicing muslims.
Slm I know we have our differences with mr Naik but find the following article diabolical, I mean anybod who doesn't conform to non-islamic values is deemed a terrorist: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/ar ticle7140235.ece
