I do not like to play " link link", where in you post a link to a book and then I post another link refuting the first book. This is a forum where we can discuss and learn. If one feels his standing is not correct, he should not feel any ego in changing his stance. As far as your link with the article entitled " Itna na badha pakiya daaman ki hikayat", please be informed that I received this article the day it was released. I have the fatwa which is mentioned in that article. Simple thing for me would be to post a link to another article in which all these points have been answered long back. Here is the link http://www.slideshare.net/sunnicreative/do-haqiqat-afrozebaraten-26-feb? But I do not like this methodology of pasting link without actually quoting your point from the link. You posted a link , why did you not quote a few things from there so that those who do not know Urdu can get some ( if not all) idea about it? Since you did not do it, I shall do it. The biggest objection on Mawlana Yaseen Akhtar Misbahi's book is this passage : [ Quick English Translation because I just arrived home] Now a day those people who have scarce knowledge, reading and observation (experience) have understood that in your speeches and lectures unless you refute elders of the firqa e batila (wrong or deviated sect) by uttering khabees, mardood and kafir and murtad you have not fulfilled any duty of refuting these sects. These people should remove their [this] misunderstanding and adopt a correct method and methodology to refute the deviant sects so that the truth and view of ahlus sunnah is made clear and the deviancy of the deviant sects becomes clear like sun.[ Irfan e mazhab wa maslab, Author: Mawlana Yaseen Akhtar Misbahi, p 93, 3e] Those who made accusations that the book ' Irfan e Mazhab wa maslak' promotes sulah kulliyat, were asked to bring sharii evidence. So the reply was that the above passage is promoting sulah kulliyat . This all happened in the last week of January 2014. Mawlana Yaseen Akhtar Misbahi replied to these 'doubts' and accusation in a very clear and academic manner. The reply can be read here: http://www.slideshare.net/sunnicreative/do-haqiqat-afrozebaraten-26-feb? Please note the reply was made on 26 Feb 2014 Mawlana Yaseen Akhtar Misbahi made it very clear that he is not against refuting, he is only asking the method of refutation to be changed . To prove that it is not necessary to call 'kafir kafir' in every gathering, he quotes this from Bahar e shariat: Now a days there are those who say’ In the amount of time you spend calling him a kafir, it is better you spend it in the remembrance of Allah, as this is deserving of reward’. In response to this, it must be said: “Where do you find us compelling people to chant kafir, kafir all day long? The actual aim of what we are saying is that a kafir should be regarded as a kafir and if asked regarding such a person, it should be clearly declared that he is a kafir”. This does not mean that you should hide his kufr by way of your ‘sulah kul’ (corrupt compromising policy) [ Bahar e shariat, Vol 1. p 55, Farooqia Book Depot, Delhi] This can be read on page 3 of the above article linked by me. Please note this portion of Bahar e shariat has approval of Ala Hazrat My question is : When the reply was made on 26 Feb 2014 , why is that again the same issued and doubt is raised in an article written on 16 October 2014? If you ( or any one else ) think that this is not a proper answer , then prove it. The book Irfan e Mazhab wa maslak is online. If you wish you can read it and present your arguments in simple English. If you are relying on some one else's reply, then be assured, everything has been answered in a very very decent and academic manner. Please be specific about the quote. Like page no so and so such and such statement is promoting sulah kulliyat. In sha Allah it will be discussed. If you post "link" then we are not reaching anywhere. You read any book you want, contact any scholar you want. But on forum present your point in simple words.