la madhabiyyah vs Barelvis, Who forms the bigger threat to Shariah

looking at history of the past 100 years,* one can safely conclude that:
almost all the terrorist organisations in the world using muslim names sprouted from la madh'habiyyah ideology.

la madh'habiyyah = anarchy.

*you can go back 200 years to shaykh najdi's time. it is the same thing. back then, instead of a firm steel chain, the wahabi leaders held to orthodox islam by a rough rope. nowadays, they connect only with fine silk threads.

 

did you read that book by shaykh buti?

if you cannot read arabic, you can buy an english translation [link of greedypubs removed] (yes, they are the same guys who made a DMCA complaint against us and took us down for a PDF of that book posted on our site by a user).

whose answers are these that you want us to choose? don't you have a NOTA option?
why don't you read sh. buti's book? greedypubs will be delighted to have a customer.

NOTE: WE DON'T GET COMMISSION FROM greedypubs FOR LINKING THAT BOOK.
UPDATE: (9sep2024): greedypubs takes down our site without any courtesy. if copyrighted material was posted, they could at least inform us - we would remove immediately. but then. they need the dollars for their shallow graves.

 

Brother its not about choosing. Its just a discussion on the subject.

I dont envisage changing sects. Shaykh Asrar says we need to go solo to an extent, not blindfollow. That is why i'm free thinking


Do you have any honest reflections on topic?

 

Let's say la madhabiyyah are not the biggest threat, tahir ul qadri is in our time; so, would you choose la madhabiyyah over ASWJ?

 

Brothers, so the answer is la madhabiyyah are a bigger threat because.....
1) they have rejected well researched positions?
2) they formed a new sect so they are ahul bidah anyway, nothing that comes from them is good?
3) they dont even talk about shariah?
4) What they call to is not shariah?


Or are you saying the question is out of question and anybody who dares ask it is going to be consumed


Please brothers no fitna, Shaykh Ramadan Buti is quoted as saying la madhabiyyah are biggest threat to Shariah...hence it'd be nice to know how

 

Shaykh sa'di says

خشت اول چوں نہد معمار کج
تا ثریا مے رود دیوار کج

If a builder lays the first brick bent
then the entire wall will rise slanted to the skies.

So dear layman you need to lay your first stone, to build up your knowledge, straight.

 

only your free thinking without basic/proper knowlege and adab, and that too only for your self.

 

of-course, this is not a bait.

so brothers, don't misunderstand layman and jump the gun - he has our best interests at heart. after-all he is a self-avowed barelvi, so that's that. can't mean nothing evil.

go ahead hazart, please propound to us your profound observations and confound our senses with your extraordinarily lay genius.


G.P.S*:

me neither but cornish fairings taste rather good. ever tasted one? just asking...



*grand post script.

 

As Salamu Alaikum

With regards to a claim that Abandoning the madhabs is the biggest bid'a threatening the Sharia, I do not know how other Ahlus Sunnah communities are fairing but I do not regard my own community as being particularly interested in Shariah so the question is justified


Who forms the bigger threat?