Brother Haroon, as far I know, Abdul should be added before "Qayyum"; it is not one of those names which has a different meaning when used for creation and can be used independently without 'Abd like some other Asmaa'ul Husna. If I am mistaken, I apologize, I am not trying to be smart or offend.
‘that there is no clear, unequivocal text in the Qur’an to support the belief that the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) has vast knowledge, though there is such evidence in regard to Satan and the Angel of Death.’ http://shadhilitariqa.com/site/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=37&Itemid=20#_ftn27 ‘If it refers to but some of the unseen, then how is the Revered One [the Prophet] (Allah bless him and give him peace) uniquely special, when such unseen knowledge is possessed by Zayd and ‘Amr [i.e. just anyone], indeed, by every child and madman, and even by all animals and beasts? For every individual knows something that is hidden from another individual, so everyone should be called “knower of the unseen.” . . . [And] if it refers to all of the unseen, such that not one instance of it remains unknown, then this is incorrect because of scriptural and rational proofs (Hifdh al-iman (c00), 15).’ http://shadhilitariqa.com/site/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=37&Itemid=20#_ftnref25 ‘Looking back, one cannot help wondering why Khalil Ahmad’s and Ashraf ‘Ali Thanwi’s own students and teachers and friends did not ask them, before their opponents asked them: When did any Islamic scholar ever compare the knowledge of the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) to the depraved, to the mad, or to animals—even to make a point? Few Muslims would suffer such a comparison to be made with their own father, let alone the Emissary of God (Allah bless him and give him peace).’ http://shadhilitariqa.com/site/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=37&Itemid=20#_ftnref25 Shaykh Nuh used the Muhannad http://shadhilitariqa.com/site/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=37&Itemid=20#_ftn21 to exonerate the Deobandis for holding the belief of Imkan al Kadhib! Yet he fails to reference the Muhannad for the above. One cannot blame others for mistranslations or confusing the matter here. Why didn't Hamza also translate the justifications the one from Thana Bhawan penned for the filth he uttered above in his Bast al-Banan li-Kaff al-Lisan `an Kitabi Hifz al-Iman (1329H) and Taghyir al-Unwan fi Ba`di Ibarat Hifz al-Iman (1342H)? Both of these works were penned by Thanawi in response to charges of heresy against him by Sayyidi Ala Hazrat (rahmatullah alayh).
a few examples of its lies: http://www.sunniport.com/masabih/showthread.php?t=3095 --- as the example in the link shows, the deobandis made takfir on themselves. he is asked about believing that shaytan is more knowledgeable than rasulAllah sallAllahu 'alaihi wasallam. in reply, he said that we believe he is a kafir who believes that! you shameless lying hypocrite! you should have feared Allah! you and your teacher gangohi have written the same 'aqida in your book baraaheen e qaati'ah! --- ps: it kills me to reproduce the insults of the deobandis. by Allah, it breaks my heart and makes it bleed but i only do so to show their true colours.
which is duly reproduced in glossy version and annotated by another deobandit ibn adam al-kawthari who probably attempts to peddle falsehood in sweet sugar coated words. haven't seen the book, but what else can one expect from an annotation on a book of lies? may Allah never give success to their deception. http://www.mediafire.com/imageview.php?quickkey=2egwyvy0wuu&thumb=4 --- muhannad is the definitive proof of the lying hypocrites that are deobandis.
