Has anyone shown him positions of old Nabeel vs new Nabeel? He needs to be put in a corner to take a stand on his former or current positions. however, it seems like it’s a fool’s errand to try to expect conclusivity from these lowlife soap opera peers, you’d have better chances trying to make a rock bleed!
He might've spend some time in Pakistan but I know he's been in England since he was very young. My issue with him is that like his pir, he can't reconcile his current positions with his previous ones, especially when it comes to known pirs that he used to openly refute. Seems to have adopted a policy of 'can't beat them, join them'.
1. No one has said that by mentioning others, he automatically becomes a Rafidi. If Nabeel Afzal is reading this, you are strawmanning ahl al-sunna/Barelwiyya 2. As far as the quotations you used from Hadaiq e Bakhsish, they neither prove that ma'sum is mahfuz nor did the statement from an Nibras or Khayali, about which your shaykh, Irfan Shahwas thrashed by the wakil of Allama Jalali sahib, Mufti Zahid Numan Jalali 3. Your shaykh can't even read "ismat" correctly or "Nibras". See Mufti Zahid Jalali's jawab to your "Hujjat-ul-Islam":
