Democracy: government of the sheeple, by the Übermensch, for the Übermensch http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/...sidential-election-super-pac-donors.html?_r=0
some answers to these questions can be found in this book: Antony Sutton's America's Secret Establishment (1983-2002) Interview with Sutton's source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=xAqrj5PggiI --------- I believe that instead of reading international best sellers* and much trumpeted authors, sunnis should read literature such as the book above. For one, they alert people to the devilish deviousness that 'human-beings' are capable of and also teach, to some extent, the method of critical analysis, protecting against blind faith and in what way facts differ from rumors and weak sources differ from authentic sources and finally, how much can be deduced from a piece of text and the trap of projecting preconceived notions onto material which does not bring them out explicitly and thereby getting discredited completely just because of impatience in trying to over-interpret every material to fit in COMPLETELY with our hypotheses. The lessons learned can then come handy in our own grappling with deviant ideologies and their countless subterfuges and moreover, induce us to appreciate the superior intellect and foresight of our pious ulema who have refuted deviants in their books and shown us the path to secure ourselves and our dependents from their snares. So if at all you wish to read dunyawi-literature these seem to be a worthy choice. Allah(The Exalted) knows best. *best-sellers, especially fiction/self-help/personality-development/popular-science books, baring a few exceptions are mostly written to engage as many people as possible and therefore quite naturally tend to be of a moderate to low 'intellectual' depth. Excuse my use of that over-(ab)used word.
Unlayering the Middle East War Agenda: Making Sense of Absurdities so if, just for the sake of argument, we consider his analysis correct then the following questions arise: 1. Why are these 'oligarchs' striving so terribly hard for a one-world-government? What do they stand to gain if they already have 'infinitely deep pockets' and they already control the entire world from behind the scenes? 2. Especially, seeing as their plans are multi-generational, spanning over centuries, none of these will reap any benefits except those who live during the final stage. So what's the point? Or are these people 'selfless-oligarchs' who wish to keep the process going for the oligarchs of the distant future who will, what, look back and thank them for their efforts? or put flowers on their graves? or do these people expect to come back from the dead to rule the world? 3. Why and how did these oligarchs come upon this project entitled OWG? Did the oligarchs of 250 years before belong to the same family or were they close friends who suddenly felt an urge to begin a process that will end up enslaving the world for their distant progeny? so far as I can see, OWG is inevitable even if no one is actually pursuing it - the time of Dajjal and Imam Mahdi(radhiAllahuanhu). If ZE has got it right then all we can say is that the world is slowly approaching the times prophesied in hadith literature. looking from that angle, and after listening to Shaykh Asrar's lecture on the topic, it seems entirely plausible that all these events MIGHT be the handiwork of people taking instructions directly from dajjal himself! Another Antichrist-Conspiracy-Theorist, phew!
Yes you are correct, I am acknowledging the thought crime you are talking about. Thankyou for making it clear to me. I was confused on that. There is also another idea; since the whole world now takes the concepts of the three players as a natural development of human societal evolution, and as common sense (that is, you need a government, you need a military, you need a form of doing -business- called corporation), because evil exists, collusion is inevitable, and thus the consequent harms to society and sincere people, who demand truth, too is inevitable. So, the only way to avoid this is to change the idea of government, military, and doing business completely, to keep the evil out, and restart from where we left off at the end of the industrial revolution. The lobbyists are definitely evil people; people who do not fear God, who only care about this dunya and their nafs, and who have a religion infact. They must belong to some organized set of groups and must have unanimous decisions among themselves and concensuses. Chaos cannot be the lobbyists. Collusion means organization. They cannot be nameless as well. By Lobbyists, I mean the children of the promised land and thier masters who inhabit the country, who are the hidden fascists. Proof of this is that, since the days they kept on increasing in power, due to technology, the inverted logic became more and more stronger, such that nowadays, war is peace, and peace is considered war, the total opposite. Its an inverted world now as Dr Mustafa al-Badawi says in one of his translations of the work of Imam al-Haddad, the revivor from Hadramaut. Never has there been this many athiests, killings, revolutions, agreements, wars, and population movements. No country has escaped. Never has the world been this materialistic, especially concerning the Muslims. Look at the Muslim immigrants in the west, and those back home with their bags packed waiting on the airport to migrate to the West. Has mankind forgotten the reality? The Qur'an al-Karim points to a certain people who will be the most into dunya, aHras an-Naasi. They will wish they could live a thousand years. I recently came across a glimpse of the 'police state'. Look how beautiful they look on the main page. Why don't they make their officers smile and show white teeth like on most advertisements in public viewing? http://www.ucla.edu/
Ok, it sounds like your saying that “Nation” is the people, and “Country” is the land. I can understand that. There were Germans who loved their Police State, but no one says we should be sensitive of their feelings when we condemn fascism. With a careful reading of history, you’ll find slaves who loved their masters, but that doesn’t mean we should have been sensitive to their feelings when we advocated abolition. I want to know the Truth, and speak the Truth at any cost. I’m not speaking against the people (nation) or the land (country). I’m speaking against the political machine. Let’s call it “The State”. If people have somehow conflated their love of nation and country with a love of State, that is a dangerous falsehood which must be remonstrated. The State is force, and the degree to which the nation morally sanctions the State’s improper use of force is the degree of abuse of power that becomes possible. We can't hesitate to hurt feelings when the falsehoods are capable of genocide. In fact, I'd argue that the feelings your talking about are the very apprehension that I'm speaking about in the article. You are acknowledging thought crime. The lobbyists are absolutely part of the problem, but they only exist, like parasites, because we morally sanction the use of force, and therefore the abuse of force. I’m assuming you mean “nation” not “country.” Land doesn’t work hard. People work the land. The lobbyists use soft coercion. They are too cowardly to engage in overt coercion. Their existence is inevitable. Were it not for the mechanisms of overt coercion in The State, which is justified by the nation, they could not exist. They didn’t redesign. They saw the design for what it was, a mechanism by which overt force is hidden from view, and legitimized by public opinion. Now you get it. Is it? I don’t understand that. I find that really hard to believe. I know that the very least that the Nazi party was bankrolled by the Bush family bankers in Germany. Maybe you could define “lobbyist” Maybe I’m not understanding. My understanding is that a Lobbyist is the agent of the collusion of Corporation and Government. They use the wealth of the corporation as a soft coercion, to grab hold of the levers of government and use the overt coercion of the state in their favor. Is that right?
There is a nation that calls itself American and they live in the country called "America", an amalgamation of different european, african, and native cultures that make the bulk of the nation. Its very much like India, a nation made out of other nations. There are 50 million people who call themselves African "American". Another 3 million who are native "American". This is the reality on the ground. They love their country, their nation, and their sub-nations. They have feelings too. We should be sensitive to the feelings of these people. They cannot migrate to any other land. They have to live on this land, and eat the corn that grows here. They are now all native to this land just as arabs are now native to morocco, even though it was berber people's land before. The lobbyists in this country are a disguised occupier. Their actions are contrary to what the country worked hard for. Under them the rest of the country is being forced to build pyramids. The lobbyists infiltrated the system, re-designed it slow and steady. The size and resources of the country was the key. Its like the Brahmans in India. They never engage in caste fights. They have a system in place (the "backward class system"), which they use to make the newly upgraded dalit classes to kill and mame the other dalit classes that have not been upgraded yet, because those classes are still needed to clean the toilets, but still be kept in control. This logic of "war is peace" was defined by the lobbyists through the new age power house called "media", and the vast ignoramous hinterland, the red states, were indoctrinated into the ability to accept such inverted logic. The blue states were indoctrinated into it as well through other means. Nothing was left alone. The EYE sees ALL. If collusion between the three players is the culprit, then most countries are guilty of this fascism. Is this not evidence that there is someONE behind this "new world order"? How come all over the world the police sirens all ring , pretty much, the same tone? Why was David Koresh a threat to the state? Also, the fascism in Germany was an enemy and a rival for the lobbyists. These lobbyists want to go solo. That is why they are not integral to this nation, even though it appears so, and they show it too 24/7.
What's the difference between "the country" and "its nation"? How is it that the lobbyists are not part of "the country" and "its nation"? They are the an integral and inevitably part of the system that is in place. Barry was speaking to the intelligentsia when he said this. It's not the ignorant who define logic like this, it's the years of public school indoctrination it takes to accept it. In America, like Germany, the inevitable result of collusion between corporation, state and military is fascism, regardless of the original intention, which was democracy in both.
We shouldn't blame the country or its nation for this strange logic. The country never had this purpose, and the vast majority of the educated do have senses. Its the lobbiests that have captured the country and its ignorants, and who define this inverted logic. They established these prizes to award themselves.
You know we live in an Orwellian nightmare when a prize of peace is awarded to a man of war. When Barry tells us that "instruments of war have a role to play in preserving the peace" and that our troops are not makers of war but "wagers of peace" I hear Big Brother saying "WAR IS PEACE." When Barry tells us that US military occupation around the world in not to "impose our will" but to ensure that the rest of the world can, "live in freedom and prosperity" I hear Big Brother saying "FREEDOM IS SLAVERY." When Barry tells us that there is "little scientific dispute" that climate change is a security issue, and that it's not only an issue for scientists but for "military leaders" I hear Big Brother saying "IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH." Indeed, in America we are still free to scream "Down with Big Brother!" from the highest minaret if we want. But what George Orwell was saying in 1984 was that it's not enough for a police state to control the actions of the people. A police state only succeeds by controlling the minds of the people, and in order to do that they must criminalize thought. I believe America has begun to do just that. If you think that I am wrong, than you should have no objection to indulging in a little thought crime with me.
