Sahabi's Body Exhumed in Syria

Turkish alawite shiites promoting genocide of Sunnis in Baniyas

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y0P4rhRjR9I&feature=youtu.be

with Russian weapons, they seem to be so bold. why is Turkey not reigning in these genocidal shiites? erdogan is not the neo-ottoman sultan. he is a friend of the enemies of Muslims. it is astonishing, that a 7% minority is able to subjugate 85% of the population very easily. a minority is not a minority in this age. What are the Sunnis doing in Antakya province? They make up more than half the population there. Why are they not keeping these alawite shiites in check. Who cares about the impotent turkish government.

the yahood bombed the republican guards killing more then 100 of these devil shiites. the shiites dont know yet, but they are not safe either.

 

i agree brother kattarsunni. Shaykh Ahmad Habbal passed away before this fasad began. i placed this question to the leaders of this revolution in Amreeka. They are young syrians running all the youtube and all the facebook accounts. this was my question to them,

" Why are you supporting the fight in heavily populated syrian cities. dont you see that it is only Sunni cities that are being destroyed, and it really seems you are causing it. What will be left at the end? neither the cities nor the Sunni civilians. You cannot fight the Russian might power that has been placed at the hands of the blood thirsty dictator. Why dont you go out and achieve the revolution in a peaceful manner or fight outside the cities"

The answer was a unanimous, and i am not quoting them

we will be killed in open ground. cities are the best cover. if [wahabis] come to offer us, we will take it. amreeka did not help us

they agreed to send the women and children away. But then on the ground it seems they still have women and children within the cities, as if they dont care. Dont they know they have to protect the women and children?

This was all pre-planned.

 

Hazrat Hujr ibn Addi (r) according to Imam Hakim was a sahabi and was killed for the crime of loving Imam Ali(a).
قد أدرك حجر بن عدي الجاهلية ، وأكل الدم فيها ، ثم صحب رسول الله - صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم - وسمع منه ،
وشهد مع علي بن أبي طالب - رضي الله عنه - الجمل ، وصفين ، وقتل في موالاة علي

Perhaps abu Hasan overlooked the reply of Umm al-Muminin(s) in the above dialogue. Umm al-Muminin Ayesha (s) says after the above. Here is the full picture:

عن أبي الأسود، قال: دخل معاوية على عائشة فقالت: ما حملك على قتل حُجر وأصحابه؟ فقال: يا أُمّ المؤمنين! إنّي رأيت قتلهم صلاحاً للأُمّة، وإنّ بقاءَهم فسادٌ للأُمّة.
فقالت: سمعت رسول اللّه صلّى اللّه عليه وآله وسلّم يقول: سيُقتل بعذراء ناس يغضب اللّهُ لهم وأهلُ السماء

She replies I heard Rasul Allah صلّى اللّه عليه وآله وسلّم that : He will be killed in `adhra'a by those who deserve the wrath of God and angels.

 

Tell which rebels? The ones who attacked the grave of the companion?

Who will tell them? On facebook? Why can't they tell them to stop making fasad??

We should not support any one who is armed in this conflict. The only people who should be helped are the victims?

 

Allah has protected him raDyAllahu 'anhu

period

we should focus on saving the lives of our Sunni Muslims in Syria, brothers, sisters, children. no one cared about Iraq, when it happened, really. It happened in front of our eyes. Sunniport was here in 2004. Now Syria is happening. We have a chance to stop the killing of Sunni Muslims. The list that Sakti al Pakistani has posted must be contacted to issue orders to safeguard Sunni lives.

Tell the rebels to move out of civilian areas or at least send the women and children to safe spots before going on the offensive

 

Previously, Abu Aleshba and Sakti debated the role of the FSA:

http://www.sunniport.com/masabih/showthread.php?t=10206&page=13

There were reports that the rebels used 'Sarin' now those reports are being downplayed:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-22428496

The whole situation is very confusing. The insult to the grave of the sahabi is the ultimate disgrace and the safest position is to support no group.

Now to downplay the fact that they actually dug the grave to find the body!!:

How do we know whats true?? So now there was no body?? This sounds like a re mix of Wahabi and Shia agenda. Both groups have cause immense fitna.

Is it not bad enough that they dug the grave to find a body? How do we know that after having taken the body now they are claiming there was non? The Wahabis and Shia are not honest in religion.

The fact is that the Sahabi was buried in that grave:
This report gives another side to the story:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4du9vXQDM3w

Attacking graves of the companions is common:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ko6reR0Ifmo

 

the vast majority of the 25,000 followers on the tunisian shia facebook page are non-tunisian, mostly iraqis/lebanese/khaleejis

i now believe that the killing of Sunni Muslims in Syria has passed that of Iraq

no one knows how many are dying due to diseases, malnutrition, lack of medicine, treatment, Allah knows Best

To save Sunni lives, should be our number 1 priority

 

Clarity about the Maqam of Sayyiduna Hujr bin ‘Aadi (Radi Allah ‘anhu):

It has been suggested that Sayyiduna Hujr bin ‘Aadis (Radi Allah ‘anhu) body was dug up from his grave and buried somewhere else by a group of Salafi-hoodlums. There is also a picture floating around on the web suggesting it is of his blessed body. Both of this assertions are false, and have no basis in reality.

http://seekerofthesacredknowledge.w...m-of-sayyiduna-hujr-bin-aadi-radi-allah-anhu/

 

Shukran, Shaykh Abu Hasan for that beautiful excerpt.

May Allah reward you.

The desecration of such sites will forever remain a hallmark of the Nifaq of these people. More sad still, is the silence on the part of the supporters of the very perpetrators. Like I said, the Boston Bombing, apparently, warranted an entire apology note. This barely received a few lines.

 

May Allah grant victory to the sunnis in Syria. May He guide all those on the wrong path.

I was in Syria several years. My teachers are there, I have family there and I have friends there. I never saw that it would reach the level of such destruction.

 

If things weren't complicated enough, several reports, including an interview with soldiers in Syria, are confirming that the blessed body of the Sahabi was found by the Syrian Army (i.e. regime) and they are the ones who caught the perpetrator and severed his head.

This would explain how the Rawafid, supposedly, were the first to publish a photo, claiming it to be the blessed body.

 

The Rawafid have now circulated a photo of what they claim to be the blessed body of Seyyiduna Hujr Ibn Ediyy. Whether it is or isn't, Allah knows best. But is this how the clerics have honored Syria? Wake up people, FSA wahabbis destroy the Maqam, they remove the body and they keep it in their possession. Yet, somehow the Rawafid take a photo of the blessed body, or at least get hold of the photo, and upload it onto the internet. One supposedly sunni website claims exclusivity to the photo, and claims to be the first site to upload it:

http://www.sunnafiles.com/

Oh how they mock us dear sunnis, how they mock!

I hope to see some response from the following, or else, the end is nigh!

1. Shaykh Muhammad Ali Al-Sabuni [Advice and Dua for FSA and Mujahidin]:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bt-bDg3WG24

2. Shaykh Usama Al-Rifa’i: “The Syrian people were asleep for 50 years and now they have awoken.”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6eSsRVd3ess

3. Shaykh Sariya Al-Rifa’i: - “We must support the FSA.”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3u0xcMU3S5Y

4. Shaykh Anas Suwayd:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LwnKsqhzX_k

5. Shaykh Mahmud Al-Dalati:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=shvbrGXUkj0

6. Shaykh Isma’il Al-Majzub:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uF72EZcc9tQ

7. Shaykh Mahmud Al-Hamid:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qC7TA9CMyNo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q7ZcaO4oCMQ

8. Shaykh Umar Al-Rahmun:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jzyz0Deyp1A

9. Shaykh Jamal Al-Din Al-Sayrawan:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fH_t0MiXfKI

10. Shaykh Abd Al-Jalil Al-Sa’id:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EPsCV2EoEHc

11. Shaykh Anas Abd Al-Rahman Ayrut:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IPAKGPiYPLc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=64Lp1DXK9Ws

12. Shaykh Sameer Ibrahim:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lo-NZHgJwHc

13. Shaykh Rabee’I Junaydi:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hEBn13me4ys

14. Shaykh Ahmad Abd Al-Jabbar Al-Naqshbandi
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oYEpMU8F54I

Additionally:
15. Shaykh As’ad Kahil
16. Shaykh Muhammad Sa’ir Al-Shab’an [Khatib Jam’I Al-Marijah, Homs]
17. Shaykh Sahl Mahmud Junayd
18. Shaykh Mahmud Nabih Dalati [Khatib Al-Jami’ Al-Kabir, Homs]
19. Shaykh Muhammad Adnan Al-Saqa
20. Shaykh Abd Al-Karim Bakar
21. Shaykh Abd Al-Muhaymin Al-Tahhan
22. Shaykh Abd Al-Naf’I Al-Rifa’i
23. Shaykh Abd Al-Nasir Al-Qasimi
24. Shaykh Abd Al-Nasir Al-Khatib [Imam and Khatib Jam’I Ali ibn Abi Talib, Rastan]
25. Shaykh Karim Rajih
26. Shaykh Ahmad Mu’adh Al-Khatib
27. Shaykh Muhammad Hani Al-Shabqaji [Khatib Masjid Abu Bakr, Damascus]
28. Shaykh Abd Al-Nasir Daybu
29. Shaykh Ziyad Zaytun
30. Shaykh Bashar TaHa
31. Shaykh Mustafa Hanuf
32. Shaykh Mahir Al-Ziyat
33. Shaykh Abd Al-Samad Najib*
34. Shayh Muhammad el-Yaqobi

* The above list has been taken from a sister's post in another thread.

 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-22424188

i don't believe the media, but ...

 

In a video posted previously Shaykh Buti(rahimahullah) had used the hadith about not fighting under the banner of an unknown person and that such a fighter would die a death of jahiliyyah. In it he had strong comments and seeing the situation now it seems that he was right. But down the road:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gW00r8dYWIw

 

actually, lebanese shiites and syrian shiites south of homs spit at the blessed maqam even before the iranian/pakistani/indian/afghan/iraqi got the right

they need that the Maqam of Sayyiduna Mu'awiya as a symbol. They will never destroy it. Also, since he was an arabist, and wanted to appeal to Sunnis, of course he would preserve the Maqam of Sayyiduna Mu'awiya raDyAllahu 'anhu.

shiites are more concerned with building 500 huseiniyas in 100% Sunni areas of Syria to spread Shiism. Eventually, the maqams you talk about would disappear as a consequence. We Iranians know this, because it happened in our country. Learn from history.

Hafez al wahhash sold half of the plains illegally to alawites in Homs and Hama. Entire rural areas. Shiite processions spread from Aleppo to Raqqa down to Damascus. Shiite madrassas popping up like mushrooms.

and those will be the only ones that will be known once syria becomes iran or jabal amel

it would have happened eventually at the hands of iran and hezbu shaytan 2 decades down the road.

 

he is probably grieving for the 400 Sunnis martyred, including women and children, entire families, in a village just south of Baniyas.

 

personally, i have absolute Iman in Allah Ta'ala that He protects the dignity and the status of the SaHaba al Kiraam.

You dont need to worry about the Iranian Shiite tombs built on their graves, and wahabis taking revenge on them.

What we should worry about is how to save the lives of the Sunnis from the Shiites. We can rebuild the tomb of the blessed Sahabi. His blessed body can be retraced. This is what happens in chaos. There are priorities. You talk about a Sunni state. Sunnis dont want alawite shiite state or wahabi state, thats what you are saying.

In a recent conversation with an Iraqi 'Twelver from Basra, a man i thought would be sane, as he is a scientific intellectual, expecting some sort of 'unity'with Sunnis argument from his side, instead he ended up saying, "the Sunnis will be defeated, and they will be expelled, we Shi'a have the army and the oil"

 

The Jihad of the FSA began as a defense to the attacks of the regime. Which was good.

Later, it became clear that the crux of their movement was wanting democracy. Not Islam.

Several months ago it became clear that the FSA was starting to lose followers; following reports that they were stealing from the Syrian people.

The overtly Wahabbi rebel groups came on the scene, FSA was made to look like a truly 'Sunni' group.

Several months ago, the FSA starts to show signs of being Wahabbi orientated; following reports of their attacks on maqams.

My point: The clerics should have, realistically, started condemning the FSA months ago. If not, they should have at least started condemning them now. Apparently the Boston Bombings can warrant an entire apology note from these 'Revolutionaries'; but attacks on el-Sahaba el-Kiram can barely conjure a few lines.

 

my question to you and others who have been following this issue is:

has the FSA
a) always been crooked,
OR
b) has it now been hijacked by crooks,
OR
c) good people were fooled and used and abused by crooks who already had a set agenda?

if it started out with nice guys and is now infiltrated by wahabis and what have you crooks, then essentially all those shuyukh or any other decent people who supported it in the beginning, can't be held guilty for supporting the FSA in the early days. the same goes if it was actually cleverly used and abused by crooks.

now however, they should condemn the destruction of Sunni heritage

i'm just trying to get my head around the mess.

 

Where is Sheykh el-Sabuni now that the companions of the Messenger of Allah (Peace be upon him) are being harmed?

Why does he not condemn these "heroes" and "his sons"?!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_rarLZAQOFo

I had the opportunity of benefiting from the Sheykh's durus on Ulum el-Quran in the past. But I now hold a very different emotion regarding him. May Allah guide all those clerics who supported the FSA towards the truth.