The bottom line is : The Wahabbis love to misquote and provide wrong reference. I will give two such examples from the 2 refutation link I posted. First, the wahabbi mufti and party claimed that the book miat al masail is by Shah Ishaq muhaddith al dehlawi ( rh). I showed the manuscript evidence that this is not the case and also that Shaykh Abdal Hayy in his Nuzhatul Khawatir has also not included this work as a work of Shah Ishaq (rh). Second, the Wahabbi mufti and party said that Molwi Rashid Gangohi given the answer as per the fatwa issued by Shah Ishaq. I then scanned the fatwa rashidia and showed that even this reference is wrong. Both the scans can be seen on the links. But the problem is these wahabbis/deobandis don't even know or understand simple things. Go to their forum and we can see this. One of them gives a false reference and other comes and says" wow, ". On the same forum, a wahabbi said " The sunnis ( barelwis) think saints can be present at more than one place at the same time". Other comes and says:" This is pure shirk". So a brother comes and asks me a for a reference to refute this. I sent him a reply showing how Ashraf ali thanvi and gangohi used to be present at 2 places at the same time and also the body parts of saint Musaji used to be present at different locations at the same time. After this was posted, the deobandis were shocked. One of them said:" Can some one please reply to this, as we ( deobandis) are often left unanswered when we get this type of references". After a week, the thread was quietly deleted. Now where is the honesty? How come some thing which is shirk for we sunnis becomes a karamat for their scholars?? But most average people on these wahabbi forum can not relate all this and they are happy singing the song of bida'h and shirk and living happily ever after on those forum. --- In case you see some refutation of any of the articles mentioned on falaah.co.uk, please send me the link in PM.
You sometimes feel pity for these guys. I have seen on some wahabi forums wahabis saying the two articles are factually incorrect. Sufis find their findings incorrect and wahabis find their findings incorrect. They really need to pick a side and stick to it. It's been what... a 144 years since their founding.
He is same Ismaeel Nakhuda who was caught lying along with a deobandi Mufti when they both wrote the article" Deoband and Istighatha". This deobandi article is still found on internet. The mufti happens to be "ameer" of a deobandi forum. The whole group was refuted more than an year back and no reply has come from them. Here is the refutation http://www.falaah.co.uk/refutation/wahabi/136-deobandi-mufti-and-istighatha-.html http://www.falaah.co.uk/refutation/wahabi/137-deobandi-mufti-and-party-caught-lying-.html
http://www.deoband.org/2010/11/tasawwuf/sufism-and-the-imams-of-the-salafi-movement-introduction/ http://www.deoband.org/2011/01/tasa...haykh-muhammad-bin-‘abd-al-wahhab-and-sufism/ Isn't this ismaeel nakhuda also related to nuh keller in some way? I wonder which side nuh haa meem keller and others like faraz rabbani are going to take now original after "An original Deoband.org article"! Is they going to strike a salute to the wahabi command center or dissociate from the deobandis? It's not easy being at a war with yourself. sunnistudent, where art thou?
