Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Multimedia' started by Aqdas, Aug 9, 2020.
This answer here is enough to reveal his jahalah, the so called rafDi muhadith and author of multi volume books of hadith does not understand what does sahabi mean. ibn u'yainah rahimahullah says that to be a sahabi, even if no other superiority (faDilah) is proved or known, then still it is far greater superiority than being a pious, mujahid, and mujtahid imam of muhaditheen and fuqaha like imam ibn Mubarak rahimahullah.
yet, there are ahadith in faDail of sayyiduna Amir Mu'awiyyah raDiAllahu 'anh but to the rafDi it is nasibiyyat, al i'yadhu billah.
Disgusting how at 1:35 he says:
'In every maktab e fikr that is ahlu's sunnah.'
I'm sure he's done that so he can include devbandis into ahlu's sunnah.
Very good reply from Mufti Rashid Mehmood Rizvi Sahib to Tahir Minhaji:
Books by A’ala Hazrat in the Manaaqib Praise of Sayyiduna Amir Muawiyyah
Dr Tahir ul Qadri Sahib claims to love and follow Muajddid A’azam Shaykh ul Islam A’ala Hazrat Imam Ahmed Raza Khan rahmatullah ‘alaihi he obviously did not come across these rasaail by the great Imam.
Books by Muajddid A’azam Shaykh ul Islam A’ala Hazrat Imam Ahmed Raza Khan rahmatullah ‘alaihi in the Manaaqib Praise of Sayyiduna Amir Muawiyyah radi Allahu Ta'ala ‘anhu <O</O
Al Bushra al ‘Aajilah min Tuhaf Aajilah<O</O
Written in refutation of the tafzeelis and the those that do the tafseeq of Sayyiduna Amir Muawiyyah radi Allahu Ta'ala ‘anhu<O</O
‘Arsh al Izaaz wa Ikraam li Awwal Muluk al Islam<O</O
Manaaqib of Sayyiduna Amir Muawiyyah radi Allahu Ta'ala ‘anhu <O</O
Dhabb al Ahwaa al Waahiyyah fi Baab al Amir Muawiyyah<O</O
An answer to the revilers of Sayyiduna Amir Muawiyyah radi Allahu Ta'ala ‘anhu
Al A’alaam al Sahaabah al Mawaafiqeen lil Amir Muawiyyah wa Umm al Mumineen<O</O
The Sahaabah Kiraam companions that were with Sayyidah ‘Aishah al Siddiqah radi Allahu Ta'ala ‘anhaa and Sayyiduna Amir Muawiyyah radi Allahu Ta'ala ‘anhu
<O</OAl Ahaadith al Raawiyyah li Madh al Amir al Muawiyyah <O</O
Hadith containing the Manaaqib of Sayyiduna Amir Muawiyyah radi Allahu Ta'ala ‘anhu <O</O
Allah Tabaarak wa Ta'ala hidaayat ata farmai aameen ya Rabb al A'alameen
Syed Irfan Shah Sahib was asked on Thursday regarding this:
this is the bloody rafzis' opinion on ahl al-kitab
tahir is worse than them
as i said, even those shias who at least have human integrity and are loyal to their beliefs, will find him repulsive
according to their beliefs too, christians and jews are NOT believers, as they deny the prophethood of The Prophet, sal Allahu 3alayhi wa sallam
their 3aqaid al-imamiyah
http://shiaweb.org/shia/aqaed_al-emamia/pa7.html (on islam being the only true religion)
http://shiaweb.org/shia/aqaed_al-emamia/pa6.html (on prophethood)
from another book al-melal:
This is what happens when you try and please everyone and forget your own. From being a Sunni (as he first was) look at what he has morphed into! He now thinks Jews and Christians are believers, asks idol worshippers to call out to their Gods saying we are all worshipping the same Deity, insults Sunni Scholars, tries to get in the good books of Shias etc etc
dhobi ka kutta na ghar ka na ghat ka.
finally saw all the videos on this thread
they say there's an element of truth in humor too. watch how he humorously tells his blind fanboys "aap log tayyaariyaan shuroo kar dein" in the end, after announcing his trip. of course, he isn't a conceited demagogue and it's all in good humor innit? real scholars don't long to be greeted with garlands and red carpets, do they?
i disagree with brother noorie's analysis of him as a rafizi. this trash can is too selfish to even be a closet rafizi.
what i think he is doing is that he's clutching at straws. disguising tafzilism/shiaism as Sunnism is his last ditch effort at saving face and he's playing that card. sure, he's promoting closet shiaism and closet tafzilism to the masses, but what he's really doing is that he's leveraging off the shias and tafzilis in a bid to lash out at all those great scholars who have stripped him naked and hung his jahalah out to dry.
see the hatred and evil in his eyes as he pauses, and see the disgust with which he talks about them. it's very very clear who he's talking about when he's attacking about people who use a "certain name" as opposed to Ahlus Sunnah.
he makes it even more clear as sunshine when he says that they claim to be admirers and followers of Ala Hazrat, but they are actually neo-kharijis who have a grudge against his minhajush-shaytan
it's a given he's referring to the likes of Shaykh Akhtar Raza Sahab, Irfan Shah Sahab, Muzaffar Shah Sahab and other Sunni scholars of the subcontinent who have put this trash can in its rightful place
may Allah cause truthful statements in similar tones to come out against him.
so his bottom line from all that long winded talk is - we don't call Sayyidina Ameer Mu3awiyah as "bad" but we SHOULD NOT call him as good; it is an 3ayb to discuss his manaqib. how dare a Sunni discuss manaqib of Ameer Mu3awiyah on the eve of the 10th Muharram. how dare someone ever do it. we will never say anything good about Ameer Mu3awiyah radi Allahu 3anhu, but we won't say anything bad either because he's a sahabi. (al 3eyadhu billah)
this is nothing but pretentiousness and a thinly veiled and diplomatic expression of hatred for Ameer Mu3awiyah, and he has the nerve to say that it is us Sunnis who have a grudge against the Ahlul Bayt
as i said, sure, he is propagating a diplomatic and politically correct version or a closet version of rafzism and tafzilism, but knowing him, he's USING them too for his dajjalic endeavors, and isn't even loyal to the rafzis and tafzilis.
Laa Hawla Wala Quwwata Illaa Billah!
just finished reading a number of relevant pages from tabSiratu'l adillah.
i think tahir has shot himself in the foot with his arrogant banter.
i don't understand on what basis he makes the claim that "tabSiratu'l adillah is the greatest book of aqidah in islam and there is no other book greater than this in the history of islam" [@9.00]
imam abu mu'yin an-nasafi passed away in 508AH and he is also the author of al-tamhid.
other books of aqidah:
fiqh al-akbar by imam a'azam (d.150 AH)
taHawiyah by imam abu ja'afar (d.321 AH)
kitabu't tawHid by imam abu mansur maturidi (d.333 AH)
books of imam abu'l hasan al-ash'ariyy (d.324 AH)
kitabu'l iytqad and al-asma wa's sifat by imam bayhaqi (d.458 AH)
books of imam ghazali (d.505 AH) and his master imam al-haramayn (d.478 AH): al-irshad etc
al-inSaf by baqillani (d.403 AH)
aqdas called me to correct that tahir is saying: kutub hoN; but given tahir's history of mistakes, i must have taken it thus.
i suppose we should give him benefit of doubt.
Look at the idiots dancing - honestly are these people mental or just utterly ignorant of what Sharia says!!
in a book of aqidah, he said.
asl main jootay maranay jaanay kay qabil yeh mardood khud hi hay, Allah yis murtad rafzi ko gharat or zaleel o khwar karay.
every time i watch him i have a strong feeling that he is acting, look at his pauses and gestures. He is the greatest munafiq i've ever seen. whatever he said befits him more than anyone else.
who was it who accused us of being (modern) arab wannabe's?
are they blind to tahir's inferiority complex at being desi and always cladding shaami style or now maghrebi (north-west african) style thobes with the hood and all. why doesn't he do any videos in his traditional clothing?
He is coming back to Pakistan on November 2012, look at his followers dance after his announcement: