let us put it this way - the way he speaks is far far superior to his thoughts. thus if you give 70 marks to his speech, you can give 1.5 marks to the quality of his thought if you are generous.
and this: https://youtube.com/shorts/YuTr0EjvPSg what is this? is it a rational argument? of course not - it is an "aayah". i wouldn't be surprised if akram comes out wearing trousers on his head and insist that he walks with his head and therefore, the trousers are in the rightful place. read this in his accent: "is this a hyeadd? nwo. this is naat a hyeadd. i am vering this pyant you see. so this kennaat be my hyeadd, you see. you don't veyr pants on your hedd. this is vandurful argument you see. proves i am vaaking on my head."
one thing is sure: there is no way one can prove that akram nadwi has a brain in that empty skull of his. just shake your head and say: "not convincing. you are an imbecile" mujhe hayrat un maulviyon pe hoti hai jo is aHmaq ko sar pe uthaye phirte hain.
such a moron and an ignoramus! he doesn't know what he is talking about - blabbering, muttering as if he knows something. ---- sh.yaqubi is one of the very intelligent people i have come across, well-read, high-born, charismatic, articulate and speaks many languages. in fact, his english is good and proper ignoring the arabic accent. it is beyond me what he sees in this uncouth and disgusting fellow. --- the idiot (i mean akram nadwi) does not know kalam nor rational argument - nor the basics of quranic sciences. an analogy to explain my disgust: imagine akram nadwi trying to scoff at charles' english accent... that is the kind of feeling his comments about kalam, qur'an and rational argument evoke in a student of islam. yet people get offended if one points out that the tramp is naked. laa Hawla wa laa quwwata illa billah.
