Usual deobandi slanders against Sayyidi Ala Hadrat 'alyhi rahma

:s2:

I listened to the first part of the talk, and after listening to it all I can say is that it is indeed a dark age we are living in if the speaker is referred to as 'Hadrat Maulana' and if one was to take their religion from him. Refutation of something or somebody is one thing and rabid hatred is another thing altogether. And this talk is a prime example of the latter.

 

shaykh nuh and shaykh gibril are respected and followed only if their aqidah is in line with that which is described and aided by alaHazrat.

alaHazrat is the yardstick of our times; everybody comes after.

alaHazrat IS the standard bearer of ahlu's sunnah and if it was not for him, the deobandis would have not been forced on their wahabi-backfoot hiding the heresies of their elders. and perhaps shaykh nuH would not have his deobandi murids...

as for shaykh nuH's article - with due respect to the shaykh - how can the shaykh dismiss anyone without proper research? and how can one expect justice from an ex parte judgement?

it is either prejudice [leaning towards his murids lobbying] or poor research. and we reject this article also for its bad reasoning mainly based on assumptions.

however we do not doubt the intention of the shaykh - he tries to unite the ummah and he himself does not approve or condone the atrocious beliefs/statements of deobandis.

---
as for shaykh gibril, his so-called 'good opinion' about deobandis was long long ago. but it is fair to assume that he did not know about the deobandis very much.

even if he does now, he is trying to be fair by being careful. show me one instance in recent years where he has dismissed alaHazrat? infact, in one of his lists he puts him on the top scholars of the last century.

you can see his respect and admiration of alaHazrat [which makes us love him all the more]; his fatawa and research prove that alaHazrat was no different from arab sunnis. and in many ways, he is the closest to alaHazrat's opinions [after all they are standard sunni beliefs].

---
as for alaHazrat's greatness as a scholar: his books are an ample evidence of his genius. we don't have to convince anyone of his scholarship; and if you are blind, it is difficult to explain what is white and what it means by bright.

Allah ta'ala knows best.

 

brothers how can we answer to the articles & writings of Shaykh Nuh Keller, Shaykh GF Haddad defending Deobandi Ulama ?

Please see this article where students of Shaykh Nuh defend Deobandis:
http://attalib.blogspot.com/2007/02/mistaken-takfir.html

see what he writes:

Also, no one so far has refuted the book of Dr. Khalid Mahmood, Mutala Barelwiyyat of which bits and pieces were translated and published everywhere on the internet.



abu nibras, abu hasan or aqdas -- Any comments about this ?

 

i disagree. there has never been a 'decent' refutation by any deobandi. only ad hominem comments and slander right from he-whose-knowledge-is-no-special-than-a-madman thanawi.

and deobandi standards?
alaHazrat expressly forbade us to answer their 'standard' refutation in the form of chandpuri's abuses. which they proclaim with pride even to this day. also see here.

---
and the so called deobandi 'moderates' do not even have the conscience [or the spine] to distance themselves from this filth. do not be surprised if any of the celebrity dobbies reference to this site and when asked about such enormous lies, glibly and doe-eyed say:

'take what is beneficial and leave what is bad.'

---
alaHazrat summed these 'standards' beautifully in one of his articles:

the deobandis have chosen one Hadith to act upon for a lifetime: 'if you have no shame do whatever you want.' / fa idha lam tastaHi faSna'a ma shiyt.
​

---
Hasbuna Allah wa niyma'l wakil. wa la Hawla wa la quwwata illa billah.

 

I was referred to the following site by A deo as the first title supposedly exposes Ala Hadrat 'alyhi rahma:

http://www.thedefendersoftruth.com/Ver2.0/UlemasOnline.asp

Has anyone else heard this and know of a refutation??

Jazakallah