Will let some of the learned brothers comment on that. In short, the Arab scholars due to being of different language and culture and devbandis being master conmen hiding their true colors in front of them, do interact with devbandis, exchange ijazas etc. As seen in the previous posts, WE too endorse Ghayat Al-Mamul. Its only a devbandi fantasy and hallucination that Shaykh Barzanji retracted from his fatwa. This is funny zameel is citing his own devbandis who supposedly are narrating an Arab shaykh's opinion... he can trust his hallucinating shaykhs reportage. A neutral person can't and shouldn't. We obviously don't. If trump says lebanon has the capabilities to annex texas 'coz my buddy netanyahu said so, will any neutral person take it seriously?
These people have nothing else to do in their lives so they write this trash garbage "barelwism" wordpress.
https://barelwism.wordpress.com/202...ahmad-madanis-ijazahs-from-scholars-of-hijaz/ https://barelwism.wordpress.com/202...al-tarablusis-endorsement-of-ghayat-al-mamul/ https://barelwism.wordpress.com/202...lusi-1878-1950-ce-on-ahmad-rida-khan-barelwi/ What about these?
https://barelwism.wordpress.com/2019/01/19/ghayat-al-mamul-the-scholars-of-madinah-refute-aḥmad-riḍa-khans-views-on-ilm-al-ghayb/ If anyone has a jawab to this