Aqib alQadri
sunniport user
this is similar to saying that Jihaad with Qalam is useless.
Personal attacks in posts
- Thread starter Aqib alQadri
- Start date
this is similar to saying that Jihaad with Qalam is useless.
Abu Hamza
sunniport user
ok mujahid e azam, carry on performing this jihad" in your bedroom with the curtains drawn.
Aqib alQadri
sunniport user
pathetic, and ignorance unbounded.
perhaps you will apply this to the greatest Ulema of our times also - such as Ala Hazrat. for he never carried the sword - he used his knowledge, his pen - very, very effectively.
rightly applies to juhala like you - accusing others, whilst hiding behind an assumed name. the coward should remove the gumbad of Ala Hazrat from his avatar.
Aqib alQadri
sunniport user
Ala Hazrat wrote almost a century ago; his writings are still having the effect he wanted them to have. so much so, that novices who just copy from him also become victorious. Ala Hazrat is not 'present' to argue with present day deviants but his writings are conveyed on to hundreds of millions.
and YES, this forum is watched; by Sunnis, and by deobandis, minhaajis, salafis, & even so called sunnis sitting on the fence.
and it is making a difference to many, many people.
the truth is bitter, and not digestible when it is about people one 'adores'.
people who think that this forum is a waste of time, should simply leave rather than keep whining that "writing" does not make a difference.
Abu Hamza
sunniport user
There is your stumbling point, you seem to think you can do what Alahazrat did, let me burst that little bubble for you right now... YOU CANT! Hiding behind an assumed name? Having a kunya is a sunnah so according to your logic anyone with a kunya is "hiding behind an assumed name (dangerous waters) tell that to Unbeknown - Modern day khwarij are extremely subtle in their approach, but the fact that they have "Qadri" attached to their names and then try exposing the shortcomings of Ahlul Bayt on public forums removes the mask of deception from their
Last edited by a moderator:
Abu Hamza
sunniport user
And let me assure you, AlaHazrat would not be sitting on public forums performing "Qalami Jihaad", shows how 'highly' you think of him, and let me also tell you the voice that resonates from those that have observed the antics of keyboard warriors like yourself on this forum - "Barelvis are the most despised people on the face of the earth" so give yourself a pat on the back and you can have another thirty minutes on the xbox, you've done yourself proud
Abu Hamza
sunniport user
at last, Abu Hamza is coming out of the closet......
well done sidi Aqib
Out the closest, lol i say it loud and proud I am not barelvi, (modern day barelvi) who accuse Ahlul Bayt of -------------------you can associate with them if you like but not me
Last edited by a moderator:
Brother Barry
sunniport user
No worries I understood you had jumped the gun a little at my comment, but all's well that ends well as they say
Abu Hamza
sunniport user
Typical, covering the short comings of those you deem close but exposing others @Unbeknown it does however prove what ive been saying all along, drop the charade and the double standards!
Brother Barry
sunniport user
And to the other posters.. come on guyes must we drift off topic with all this handbags at dawn stuff.
okay, then you shouldn't waste your time here and get lost, it is a pure barailvi (true ahlussunah wa'l jamah in the subcontinent) forum. if you want to present your point of view then you are welcome but you need to abstain from personal attacks and bad language. this is first and last warning to you.
Abu Hamza
sunniport user
Read the post again, dont take me out of context, as for bad language, where?
see your foul language;
brother aqib if you use words like below then other side will get offended too.
brother aqib if you use words like below then other side will get offended too.
Aqib alQadri
sunniport user
Brother Noori: read the posts in chronological order please.
My posts are respectful, and my response was to Abu Hamza was ONLY when he came up with the brilliant idea of "Jihad" in the "Bedroom".
It would be of academic interest to all of us to know, what is the Hukm of Shariah on Abu Hamza for degrading the sacred duty of Jihad, by relating it to the activities in the Bedroom.
In light of the above, I have absolutely no remorse in calling him what I did: what would you call him?
Last edited:
brother Aqib,
abu Hamza's post #6 was an out of place citation - as correct narration of ahadith concerns all of us, more so when the incorrect narration in this specific instance has been abused by dajjal tahir to further his kufriya agenda.
your reply in #7 was very apt
then you guys had some exchanges post #9 onward. i'm not playing referee or taking sides or getting involved in the fight here, but i think you should fight fairly.
from my reading of the thread, the only thing abu Hamza degraded was what according to him is your 'keyboard warrior' attitude, and not the sacred duty of jihad. it is disingenuous of you to suggest so and make a case of degradation of sacred duties or something out of it.
if it was me in your place, the maximum i can say is that abu Hamza's post #13 is a sarcastic jab at me. i would have further added that abu Hamza doesn't seem to think that posting content on the forum or the net is a part of jihad bil lisan, at least by commoners like us. it isn't very clear from the thread if he altogether denies jihad by the pen. i'm not speaking for abu Hamza or his mouthpiece, but i think his comment
in #19 seems to suggest that (in abu Hamza's opinion) posting on forums/net doesn't constitute the proper jihad by the pen that was done by Ala Hazrat and other scholars.
again, i'm not taking sides or getting involved in the feud, but personally i found it shocking that you'd lay a charge of 'degradation of the sacred duty of jihad' because of it.
Allahu a3lam.
I read all the posts, and I can see that he is sarcastic at you. I am no one to issue a sharia'ah ruling, but apparently he is just unfairly mocking at you. yes he has used very bad example and quite disgusting, but only his admittance or rejection of your claim will apply a ruling by a mufti.
apart from his personal attack i found it the most disgusting that he said
but he also qualified it with "modern day barelvi" to make an escape.
my point was that, regardless whether you have any remorse or not, your remarks would certainly provoke more foul language. he already has got a warning, and if he continues with this same attitude then he'll get a kick.
Last edited:
Unbeknown
sunniport user
perhaps many people did not see the words in #18 and #21 that were edited out by some moderator.
this is the second time that he has called a sunni 'khawarij' (I don't know if this time he meant me or sidi Aqib) and he also called him 'mal'oon'.
He also accused 'modern day barelvis' (by which he basically implies everyone who doesn't agree with him; see the recent beard thread) of something heinous. This was clearly meant to be a bait but unfortunately for him it got removed before anyone swallowed it.
Abu Hamza has been trolling the forum for sometime now. I request everyone to remember the golden rule,
this is the second time that he has called a sunni 'khawarij' (I don't know if this time he meant me or sidi Aqib) and he also called him 'mal'oon'.
He also accused 'modern day barelvis' (by which he basically implies everyone who doesn't agree with him; see the recent beard thread) of something heinous. This was clearly meant to be a bait but unfortunately for him it got removed before anyone swallowed it.
Abu Hamza has been trolling the forum for sometime now. I request everyone to remember the golden rule,
i didn't see it otherwise a kick was the most appropriate response.
Notice to Abu H: if you are a fan of padri then you are not welcome here at all.