Aqdas facebook posts

All the posts of Honourable brother Aqdas should be compiled into a book.

They are very good and present the teachings of the Ahlu Sunnah in a very simplified and constructive manner.

May Allah Azzawajal bless brother Aqdas for the work he is doing for the Deen and the Ahlu Sunnah.
 
Dear scholars,

When you speak, always consider the laity (awaam). Give them an inch and they'll take a mile.

When you talk about the priorities of ulama AND THEN conflate social ills with aqidah ones and PRIORITISE social problems whilst downplaying core aqidah points - what will the layman take away?

Exactly that anyone who now talks about these aqidah issues is not with the times!

You're giving a heyday to sulh kullis. Those that fail to recognise deobandis as being outside Ahlu's Sunnah will share your words endlessly as you've given them ample ammunition.

If you want to highlight social ills, do so. We all should, nay, MUST. But where's your wisdom that the Qur'an calls for? You're preaching to awaam, don't forget. They'll take your conflation and shout: 'no more need to defend that Allah ta'ala is free from falsehood. Shaykh said we must talk about drugs and alcohol instead.'

This is typical filibuster.

And if you must compare, why use those examples that are from the necessities of Ahlu's Sunnah? Why couldn't you talk about actual secondary and tertiary issues? Why didn't you say: 'there's a bigger priority to tackle social ills than debate about raf' al-yadayn.'

(And by the way, don't prioritise it, but do tell us your views on deobandis who to this day write and believe lying is included within Divine Power. Take your time, don't prioritise).

Also, do tell us what's more important: aqidah or actions? Is it acceptable that a man believes lying to be included within Divine Power but he stays away from drugs and alcohol?

Are only societal ills ills? Aren't aqidah ills ills?

Like I said, no one is saying highlighting societal ills isn't important. But there are ways to do it. Creating a standoff between aqidah and social ills truly downplays obligatory aqidah points.

A better statement would be:

'Use your jumu'ah khutbah effectively. Alongside critical aqidah points such as refuting the mutazilite heresy that Allah ta'ala can lie and which deobandis have revived and that believing Ali to be superior to Abu Bakr is innovation - our khatibs should also use the 52 Friday's in a year to highlight drug problems, alcohol, fornication, gambling. These societal ills surround us and plague every other Muslim home.

Atheism, Darwinism, perennialism, sulh kullism are also rife. Our khatibs should highlight these too.

Use the 52 weeks to cover as many pressing issues as possible.'

---
See, with the above, nothing is downplayed. Sulh kullis don't have a field day. Simultaneously, those khatibs who never touch on drugs and alcohol are also given a shake up whilst the primary importance of aqidah is maintained.

---
Allah ta'ala grant us wisdom.
Allah ta'ala Knows best.
 

Attachments

  • FB_IMG_1504017797442.jpg
    FB_IMG_1504017797442.jpg
    54.3 KB · Views: 666
astaghfirullah a thousand times.

this "shaykh" is telling us that defending the tanzeeh of Allah ta'ala from the attacks of the heretics is same as "discussing refined theological issues inside the closed doors of a mosque" and should therefore take a back seat in our attempts to battle social waywardness.

this is not speech of a scholar, it is the speech of an ignorant and materialist social activist with debilitating myopia and a misplaced zeal. Fie upon such scholars.

he is warning us that if didn't prioritize issues his way, we will have these ills plague our own homesteads.

thanks for your concern but no thanks.

We look to Allah subHanu wa ta'ala as our Guide and Protector and that of our future generations. We refuse to relegate education about His dhaat and sifaat to some unspecified future time when society shall have been cured of all its ills. We believe in a holistic education with an aqida-first approach as has been the way of the Ahlussunnah across generations.

Trivialising aqida issues with word games might be your forte, calling your bluff is ours.

alHamdulillahi 'ala zaalik wa huwa ni'mal wakeel.
 
Have you considered this?

The lack of activity against The Study Quran and Tahir ul shows the immense veracity of the fatawa in Husam al-Haramayn.

How, you ask? Why am I connecting the two?

Well, Husam al-Haramayn contains fatawa of kufr against five kafirs from thirty-three leading scholars of Arab Sharif.

Conversely, how many refutations from leading authorities have we had against The Study Quran or Tahir...? A handful...?

This shows that attaining fatawa from ulama is no mean feat.

So what it does emphatically prove is that those 33 ulama in Husam al-Haramayn were fully convinced of the kufr of the five kafirs.

This is despite Husam al-Haramayn being over 100 years ago where there was no mass communication. Today it is much easier to investigate but scholars still lag...

This doesn't mean The Study Quran doesn't contain kufr. It absolutely does! The point of the post is to show that many ulama won't issue a verdict of kufr even when it's more apparent than the midday sun yet a whole 33 ulama attested to the kufr of devbandis which shows how clear their kufr is!
 
Aqdas said:
This doesn't mean The Study Quran doesn't contain kufr. It absolutely does! The point of the post is to show that many ulama won't issue a verdict of kufr even when it's more apparent than the midday sun yet a whole 33 ulama attested to the kufr of devbandis which shows how clear their kufr is!
Click to expand...

The ulema of yore were indeed much more Allah-fearing; we now have just a handful of those.

majority today lack the guts, and are distracted by various other goals.
 
O Abu Layth! When will world peace ensue? When the whole world accepts the shariah of RasulAllah ﷺ! Isa alayhis salam came 2,000 years ago but it's only when he tells people he follows the shariah of Muhammad RasulAllah ﷺ that the entire earth will accept the true faith.

How did you figure that this necessitates Isa alayhis salam being superior to RasulAllah ﷺ...?

It's exactly the opposite. It proves the superiority of RasulAllah ﷺ once again.
 
In terms of converting Sunnis to their baseless ideology, wahabis and deobandis have inflicted more damage than rafidis but as for infiltrating their dogmas amongst Sunnis, rafidis have done more.

Can't we see:

- saying Sayyidah and Sayyiduna for sahabah is questioned by Sunnis
- praising and holding urs of Amir Muawiyah is opposed by "Sunnis"
- remembrances for Imam Husayn but not for Imam Hasan is done by Sunnis
- accepting Mawla Ali as superior being a valid belief is held by "Sunnis"
- critiquing sahabah is done by "Sunnis"
- opposing slogans of the four greatest sahabah is done by "Sunnis"

Rafidis have had a lot of success spreading their creed amongst us.

We need to awaken, recognise these influences and remove them from our ranks.
 
With regards to Sul-kulli:

Some of you may have been following the news with regards to Muhammad Bilal Khan who was killed in Islamabad about a week ago. Even though he seemed like he "did great work" and was "a great person" because he appeared to be at the forefront of the Namoos-e-risalat issue in Pakistan, in his other posts and videos, he openly claimed deobandiyyat.

Although I disagreed with Dr Asif Jalali with his split from Allamah Khadim, and I sided with Allamah Khadim sahib, I feel more inclined to siding with Dr Asif Jalali on the "Muhamamd Bilal Khan" issue.


I appreciate the brothers' feedback and thoughts.
 
Look at the nasheed artists of today and then consider WHY our ulama forbade qawwali with instruments.

They were wise. They knew the doors it opens.
Those who allow instruments, are you now alright with these popstar naat khwans doing what they do in the name of Islam?

Fiqh is wisdom. Not just bookish knowledge.
 
There should be conditions for allowing someone on a Sunni stage.

The man must:

1. Affirm Sunni aqidah
2. Be able to read Quran such that his prayer is valid
3. Have a full fist beard if he's hanafi
4. Not have a hairstyle that opposes the sunnah
5. Not be partaking in singing songs
6. Not share stages with deviants
7. Not promote deviants
8. Not celebrate Christmas, Easter, etc.
9. Not be an open sinner

Every person should be tested.

If a man can't do this, he mustn't be allowed anywhere near the mic. If he's so hungry for it, tell him use YouTube, not a Sunni stage.
 
Everyone who is known as a pir or scholar should be tested:

1. Read the Quran with tajwid
2. Pass a basic aqidah exam
3. Pass a basic fiqh exam
4. Confirm his view on qadiyanis, wahabis, devbandis, rafidis, tafdilis, et al
5. Confirm that Islam is the only true religion that leads to eternal salvation

These are basics. No one should be on a Sunni platform who can't do this.
 
To be fair, a lot of the scholars can't recite with tajweed. It would eliminate a large swathe of them, which I think is fair enough. Not sure how someone can be a scholar with next to 0 effort to correct his own tajweed but that's beyond my pay grade anyway. I've always just found it absurd that someone who doesn't know basics is apparently a scholar.

Kind of like how I find it absurd that we have so called sufi shuyukh that are obese yet I thought zuhd was supposed to be a thing (not talking about those who have illnesses, can't walk, and the like). Apparently you can be a sufi getting fat from 2 khatams a day and you can be a scholar whilst you don't know that there's supposed to be a different qaaf and kaaf.

On a personal note, I find it hard to follow such people so I don't.

Good posts bro
 
People sometimes ask whether they should watch the lectures or videos of misguided speakers.

My answer is blunt: why would you? What compels you to open the door to confusion? What benefit is there in listening to arguments that you are neither trained to answer nor required to understand? If you are Sunni and know the truth of your creed, then why burden yourself with the claims of those outside Ahl al-Sunnah?

If you genuinely want to learn, then watch the refutation videos where Sunni scholars dissect their clips and respond to them point by point. Those resources already exist. So why insist on watching the original content unchallenged? Why not restrict yourself to the explanations and answers provided by qualified Sunni scholarship?

Let this be understood clearly: it is forbidden for untrained laypeople to listen to speakers of deviation. This prohibition is not symbolic. It is a major sin, and major sins carry the threat of punishment. Yet many people—who cannot even recite the Qur’an with basic correctness—freely expose their minds to every voice online.

Value your iman. Your faith is more precious than your curiosity, your boredom, or your desire to “hear both sides.” This is not a game. Confusion begins subtly. Doubt enters quietly. Misguidance often starts with “I just wanted to see what they say.”

Ask yourself honestly: what benefit have you ever gained from listening to such people? Has it increased your yaqīn? Has it strengthened your connection to the Sunnah? Or has it only planted questions you cannot answer?

Do not risk your religion. Do not give misguided voices authority over your mind. Protect your heart, guard your belief, and stay within the safe guidance of those qualified to teach.

Your iman is worth safeguarding — fiercely.
 
Aqdas said:
it is forbidden for untrained laypeople to listen to speakers of deviation.
Click to expand...
#ALAHAZRAT ON LISTENING TO IGNORANT AND DEVIANT PREACHERS

Issue 130
Questioner: Mahmood al-Hasan, Gwalior

Saturday 20 Dhul-Hijjah 1333 AH

Question:
In a Jami‘ Masjid, should preaching (wa‘z) be done only with someone’s permission?
If a person wishes to give a speech, but he does not possess sufficient knowledge of the Islamic sciences, and his speech is inflammatory—can the mosque’s imam prevent him from delivering such a speech?

Answer:
In preaching—and in every matter—the foremost permission required is that of Allah and His Messenger ﷺ.

A person who does not possess adequate knowledge cannot be called a wa‘iz (preacher); calling him such is haram, and listening to his preaching is not permissible.

If someone is, God forbid, a person of deviant belief (bud-madhhab), then he is a deputy of Satan, and listening to his words is severely haram.

If someone’s speech leads to fitnah, then the imam and all the people of the mosque have the right to prevent him.

And if a fully qualified Sunni scholar of sound creed delivers a sermon, no one has the right to stop him, as Allah Almighty says:

"And who is more unjust than the one who prevents the name of Allah from being mentioned in His mosques?" (Qur’an 2:114)

And Allah Most High knows best.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top