aayat of surat shuura - explained v52

22. ma'alimu't tanzil or tafsir baghawi

muHiyu's sunnah abu muHammad Husayn ibn mas'uud al-baghawi (d.516 AH)

baghawi, shuraa v52.png
 
23. naZm al-durar fi tanasub al-aayat wa's suwar

imam burhanuddin abi'l Hasan ibrahim ibn umar al-biqayi (d. 885 AH)

biqayi, shuraa v52.png
 
25. rawayiy al-tafsir
hafiz abul faraj abd al-Rahman ibn rajab al-Hanbali (d.

under the verse in surat DuHa v7:

ibnrajab, duha v7.png
 
Last edited:
but notice tabari is not saying that RasulAllah sallAllahu alayhi wa sallam was not muslim before and became after. al-iyadhu billah.
 
27. ruH al-bayan
allamah ismayil Haqqi bursawi (d.1137 AH)

he says, when RasulAllah sallAllahu alayhi wa sallam is superior to prophet yaHya alayhi's salam, who was given prophethood in his childhood! how can it be that he did not know even iman? al-iyadhubillah. this only means, you didn't know details of iman until the revelation.

ruhalbayan, shuraa v52.png
 
in tafsir of ibn rajab quoted below, he cites the hadith, "every child is on the fiTrah; it is his/her parents who make one jew or christian".

so all of us are born muslims, but sub'HanAllah how filthy and ravaged is the heart of nouman khan - that he says such things about sayyidu'l khalq alayhis salatu wa's salam.
 
28. ruH al-maany

mufti of baghdad, abu'l faDl shihabuddin sayyid maHmud al-alusi (d.1270 AH)

one of the ta'wils of this aayat is that: "you did not know about those who would bear faith" (ahl al-iman).

---
3 snippets from the tafsir of the verse and not contiguous:

ruhalmaany, shuraa v52 a.png


---

ruhalmaany, shuraa v52 b.png




---

ruhalmaany, shuraa v52 c.png
 
29. rumuz al-kunuz fi tafsir al-kitab al-aziz

hafiz izzuddin abd al-razzaq al-rasa'aniy al-Hanbali (579-661 AH)

in this he narrates a saying of imam ahmad ibn Hanbal: a person who says that he SallAllahu alayhi wa sallam was on the religion of his community - what an ugly saying - didn't RasulAllah sallAllahu alayhi wa sallam reject eating the flesh of the animals sacrificed for their idols (nuSub)?


"indeed our Prophet SallAllahu alayhi wa sallam did not hold partners to Allah, even for a short interval of a blink of an eye - nor was he ignorant of tawHid"

salwatullahi wa salamuhu alayh.

---
2017-12-27_22-12-10.png
 
31. tafsir al-taHrir wa'l taHbir

shaykh muHammad taHir ibn aashuur.

similar to another tafsir below, ibn ashur says: 'notice Allah ta'ala did not say: 'you did not believe' rather he was told: 'you did not know about iman'.


ibnashur, shuraa v52.png
 
32. tafsir sam'ani
imam abi'l muzaffar al-sam'aani manSur ibn muHammad al-tamimi al-marwazi al-shafiyi (426-489 AH).

sam'ani, shuraa v52.png
 
33. tafsir khazin / lubabu't ta'wil fi ma'ani al-tanzil
ala'uddin ali ibn muhammad al-baghdadi, known as al-khazin (d.725 AH)

khazin, shuraa v52.png
 
On this verse, from Tafseer Noor ul Irfaan, by Allamah Ahmed Yaar Khan Naeemi:-

QUOTE
Here, a negation is made only in regards to self understanding 1.e. he did not understand faith and Book through mere presumptions; negation is not of knowledge itself because prior to revelation the Holy Prophet (Allah’s blessings and peace be upon him) was already a worshipper, a devout ascetic, and a person of piety. In fact, the first revelation came when the Holy Prophet was in a state of seclusion (I'tikaaf) and worship of Allah Almighty. Also, at no stage in their lives were the Prophets unaware of Faith. Hazrat Isa (On whom be peace) at birth had said: And He has made me a Prophet''. You should also remember that when Jibreel (On whom be peace) brought the first revelation, the Holy Prophet knew with certainty that he was Jibreel and that whatever he was reciting was the Holy Qur’an and that he was sent by Allah Almighty. Therefore, the Holy Prophet did not enquire about his identity, nor regarding whether the speech was his own, or it was the Holy Qur’an. If the Holy Prophet did not have full knowledge about these things, then this verse would have remained doubtful to the Holy Prophet as harbouring a doubt about the Holy Qur’an is an act of infidelity. Says Allah Almighty: ''In it there is no place for doubt (S21: V2).

Going to Warqa bin Naufil was to bestow faith to him and not for the personal assurance and comfort of the Holy Prophet (Allah’s blessings and peace be upon him).
UNQUOTE
 
Last edited:
Allamah Abdul Wahhab Sha'rani writes in Kibreet ul Ahmar (from Futuhaat alMakkiyah) that:

Our Master, the Holy Prophet (Allah's blessings and peace be upon him), was granted the ENTIRE Qur'an - without the details of chapters and verses - BEFORE the angel Syeduna Jibreel (upon whom be peace), came to him with the first waHy (on earth).

Knowledge of Rasul-Allah before waHy.JPG
 
abu Hasan said:
34. tafsir al-kabir
mafatiH al-ghayb
imam fakhruddin muhammad razi (544-604 AH)

View attachment 4257
Click to expand...

dozens of Tafaseer have been presented here, all of which affirm the view of ahle-Sunnah, and totally refute what NAK is implying in his lecture. alHamdolillah

it also proves that NAK has never read any of them;

and it also proves that he presents his own "tafseer" - thereby making himself worthy of punishment, as per the following aHadeeth:-

1. Whoever offers an opinion in the Qur’an without knowledge, then let him make his abode in the fire of Hell.

2. One who interprets the Qur’an according to his own opinion, even though it may be right, has erred.

That is for NAK, the "ustaadh Mufassir" of his institute; so what about his students, who become 'mini Mufassirs' after learning Arabic for a few weeks?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top