Ok, let's say Sayyid Mash'hadi has some sort of plan.
Why does that need him to boycott a Sunni scholar, say he has done kufr, call him la'nati, call him harami, issue a fatwa against him and say he is out of Ahl al-Sunnah?
So is he trying for unity with shiah supporters by ousting our own?
Even if Sayyid Irfan Shah and coterie felt so strongly about issuing fatwa of kufr, what was the point of following up with registering a case, and escalating it to court? It is clear from the news reporting that the court/police action was instigated by some 100+ peerzadas (no prizes for guessing under whose leadership). What was Shah sahib's role in that? Clearly he was anointed the spearhead.
Does anyone in the anti-Jalali brigade have any fear of the pandora's box opened by involving the government/law machinery? AbdalQadir et al have already highlighted the dangers of such precedence (and invocation of blasphemy law). How does Nabeel Afzal justify that? Since when have ulemas (in recent 100-200 years) used political crutch to settle gustakhi/kufr allegation?
gaali-galoch, spurious fatwas and ganging up aside, the ramification of this episode will be very far-reaching.