Angering Fatimah رضي اللہ عنھا and tawbah

[Aqdas]

This is being shared by Sunnis even. I reject it for the following reasons:

1. It's a Minhaji event. Keynote speaker was Shaykh al-Ibham Tahir ul. Sunnis aren't permitted to promote deviants. So tawbah is necessary for those who promoted this.

2. If it alludes to Jalali sahib: why does he need to do tawbah? Give us one proof. We've been waiting months.

3. So anyone who angers Sayyidah Fatimah once won't do tawbah? Don't some narrations (even if they're added words) and ulama talk about sayyidah being angry after the Fadak decision? I was reading Tuhfah of Shah Abdul Aziz which mentioned ghussah ba taqazaye bashariyat.

Also when Mawla Ali رضي الله عنه wished to remarry. Wasn't she angry?

Shiah poets need to consider all avenues and Sunnis need to develop some intellect before sharing and repeating such hogwash.

 

[Waqar786]

Brothers what do you think of this Shair that is shared widely amongst the opponents of Jalali sahib. It is ostensibly against Jalali sahib but could it open doors to be misused by other groups.

@abu Hasan what do you think?

 

[Waqar786]

 

[abu Hasan]

sayyidah fatimah raDiyAllahu anhaa is naaraaz with everyone with whom her great father sallAllahu alayhi wa sallam is naaraaz.

---
so here is my contention. sayyidah faTimah raDiyAllahu anhaa is naaraaz with the entire gang below. prove me wrong or prove your claim right on how to know that she is indeed naaraaz.

what a pathetic bunch! do not have the guts to issue a fatwa with sharayi proof, but hide behind fussaq na'at khwan and their rabble rousing kalam.