The Seige of Mt. Twitter

deobandis keep lying shamelessly. every one of them. they will not even examine it and point out where the "distortion" is and what is the correct translation of thanawi, nanotvi, gangohi statements.

deolie.png
 
If I’m not mistaken, was there any statement by one of the Kandhalvis in which he says he’s the biggest wahhabi or something along those lines?
 
ibnzaid said:
If I’m not mistaken, was there any statement by one of the Kandhalvis in which he says he’s the biggest wahhabi or something along those lines?
Click to expand...

even ashraf ali thanvi had a comment to that effect
upload_2025-1-22_17-19-0.png
 
Last edited:
Dear brothers

I see there is no point in showing link to Wahhabis or salafis...

Salafis/wahabis have a problem of takfir (sin) or wrong understanding of aqida but DEOBANDIS have serious issue of belittling or insulting, even the statements of Ismail dehlawi are very derogatory, who uses such language ? These insults take you outside Islam vs takfir (merely a sin)

If you ask me I would consider salafis/wahabis thousand times better than DEOBANDIS...
DEOBANDIS claim tasawwuf (they talk about wahdat Al wujud) and claim to follow hanafi madhhab yet the statements of Ashraf Ali Thanawi or Ismail Dahlawi are very ridiculous, the way they talk or discuss the issue in a mocking and demeaning way..

Ya shaykh if you disagree, you can politely say I don't agree.. why use defamatory language ???!!!!
 
HASSAN said:
View attachment 8912

This was tweeted but then deleted after a while; I cannot tell whether this person was genuinely asking or whether he was trying to cause discord.
Click to expand...

Firstly Ila alSunan of "Shaykh" Zafar Ahmad Uthmani Deobandi is taken from the work of hazrat mawlana Zafar ud-din bihari رحمة الله عليه called sahih al-bihari. the author of ila al-sunan admits to that. there are books such as 'Allama Sa'idi رحمة الله عليه 's Sharh Sahih Muslim, Tibyan ul Quran, Ni'mat alBari Sharh Sahih al Bukhari.

Mawlana Sharif Kotlawi رحمة الله عليه has a book on Hanafi adillah entitled Arbai'n al Hanafiyya

To say 'Barelwis' have no contribution isn't accurate.
 
AR Ahmed said:
the author of ila al-sunan admits to that.
Click to expand...

Asalam Alaikum brother, can you provide the evidence for this. Ila al-Sunan is considered one of their [deos] "greatest works" in defense of the of the ḥanafī school. If Zafar Thanwi did take this from Malik al-ʿulamā' who is Aʿla Hadhrats khalifa then this would indeed be a major blow to the deos.
 
HASSAN said:
Wahabi rejects the miracle of Sayyiduna RasulAllah ﷺ playing with the moon in his crib - says the matn and sanad are both rejected
Click to expand...

in the present times, wahabis shouldn't be taken up on polemic discussions on aqidah or fiqh or istighathah.

they can be simply asked why they are aligned with the dajjalic yahood against the palestinians. watch them expose themselves as the dajjal-worshippers they are - far worse than the "qubooriyyeen".
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top