AbdalQadir
time to move along! will check pm's.
Just accidentally ran into this shameful, appalling talk by Owais raza where he hints at the Shar3i requirements of deserving to be on stage and very cleverly says that the stage should only be big enough for naatkhwan and 1 or 2 chief guests - all because he's agitated at the stage breaking.
Why the naatkhwan?
Are naatkhwans counted as equal to aalims?
What about qaaris who can read the Quran beautifully? Are they more important than naatkhwans who can't pronounce Arabic letters?
Of course some people have naturally beautiful voices and also train their voices, but does that make them better than a common guy (as Owais Raza implies) who reads naats in his own tune with reverence- all else considered same?
As for the chief guest (mehman-e-khusoosi), what are the shar3i requirements of being a chief guest? He didn't seem to elaborate.
who should the chief guest be? a cricketer? a firebrand scholar who doesn't offer any knowledge based substance? a rich businessman who funded the whole gathering? who...?
This is the fault of us awam - for treating naatkhwans as halal rock stars, that they get so arrogant. Notwithstanding ulama who couldn't care less for knowledge - and now these naatkhwans are threatening their own statuses, and these sloppy ulama deserve it, for letting knowledge and learning take a back seat.
I think naatkhwani should be declared a banned profession. Gatherings should only invite random people from the audiences to recite manaqib and salat-o-salam.
Last edited: