salaam
In a discussion with a Salafi about istighatha, I brought up the narration of Malik al Dar. I mentioned some scholars who authenticated it (Ibn Sa'd, Imam Qastalani, Imam Ibn Hajar al Haytami) and that Imam Ibn Hibban listed the narrator in his al-Thiqat.
They replied that ibn Hajar was mutasaahil, and that ibn Hibban inclued people in al-Thiqat even if they were majhool. They also mentioned Imam Qastalani was mutasaahil and very lenient as well.
Another example discussion is here:
https://ia800204.us.archive.org/5/items/TheBlazingStar/The Blazing Star.pdf
I often see this type of critique from Wahhabi circles but rarely see it addressed when look at Sunni responses. Granted I am probably looking in the wrong place for it.
Can anyone share examples from our classical or later Sunni hadeeth methodology that explain how cases like these are approached?
jzk
In a discussion with a Salafi about istighatha, I brought up the narration of Malik al Dar. I mentioned some scholars who authenticated it (Ibn Sa'd, Imam Qastalani, Imam Ibn Hajar al Haytami) and that Imam Ibn Hibban listed the narrator in his al-Thiqat.
They replied that ibn Hajar was mutasaahil, and that ibn Hibban inclued people in al-Thiqat even if they were majhool. They also mentioned Imam Qastalani was mutasaahil and very lenient as well.
Another example discussion is here:
https://ia800204.us.archive.org/5/items/TheBlazingStar/The Blazing Star.pdf
I often see this type of critique from Wahhabi circles but rarely see it addressed when look at Sunni responses. Granted I am probably looking in the wrong place for it.
Can anyone share examples from our classical or later Sunni hadeeth methodology that explain how cases like these are approached?
jzk