abu Hasan
Administrator
al-malfuzat, vol.1 / pg. 78
mawlana mustafa raza khan writes: mawlāna nayimuddin muradabadi, mawlana zafaruddin bihari, mawlwi ahmed mukhtar meeruti, mawlwi ahmed ali, mawlana raHm ilahi, the secretary of anjuman-e-ahl-e-sunnat and a teacher of madrasah-e-ahl-e-sunnat, mawlana amjad ali, teacher of madarasah-e-ahl-e-sunnat and the manager of matba-e-ahl-e-sunnat were all present at a gathering after a debate with the arya samajis.
all these distinguished scholars had returned triumphant from the debate and they were discussing the shamelessness of the proponent of arya samaj in these debates – a hindu named ramchandar.
they were talking about how he was not able to comprehend the argument but still would be audacious so say something in reply (whether it made sense or not).
alaHazrat said:
it is a grave mistake that verbal debates are held with such people. because, they keep saying anything they wish, as a reply. common folk are fooled into believing that he is a great speechmaker, who is capable of answering everything. it is humanly impossible to shut this kind of people. infact, these shameless infidels will not stop speaking even in the presence of Allāh táālā. that is why their mouths will be sealed as it is said:
‘it is on that day We shall seal their mouths; and their hands shall speak, and their feet bear witness concerning that which they have earned.’ [surah yasin/v.65 ]
therefore, it should always be a written debate with such people so that they cannot slither away, or change their tack. many people make this mistake and they argue with wahabis and others on such furuyi matters. infact, wahabi, qadiani, ghayr-muqallid and others want to argue on extraneous matters, instead of principles. one should never allow them to spring this trap – tell them to first come within the boundaries of islām and prove yourselves as muslims and then argue on such extraneous matters. [1]
[FONT="]1. note that alaHazrat was talking about wahabis of his time who had notoriously insulted RasūlAllāh şallAllāhu álayhi wa sallam by their words and stubbornly refused to repent. i suppose this doesn’t apply to the clueless wahabis of our age. Allāh táālā knows best.[/FONT]
mawlana mustafa raza khan writes: mawlāna nayimuddin muradabadi, mawlana zafaruddin bihari, mawlwi ahmed mukhtar meeruti, mawlwi ahmed ali, mawlana raHm ilahi, the secretary of anjuman-e-ahl-e-sunnat and a teacher of madrasah-e-ahl-e-sunnat, mawlana amjad ali, teacher of madarasah-e-ahl-e-sunnat and the manager of matba-e-ahl-e-sunnat were all present at a gathering after a debate with the arya samajis.
all these distinguished scholars had returned triumphant from the debate and they were discussing the shamelessness of the proponent of arya samaj in these debates – a hindu named ramchandar.
they were talking about how he was not able to comprehend the argument but still would be audacious so say something in reply (whether it made sense or not).
alaHazrat said:
it is a grave mistake that verbal debates are held with such people. because, they keep saying anything they wish, as a reply. common folk are fooled into believing that he is a great speechmaker, who is capable of answering everything. it is humanly impossible to shut this kind of people. infact, these shameless infidels will not stop speaking even in the presence of Allāh táālā. that is why their mouths will be sealed as it is said:
‘it is on that day We shall seal their mouths; and their hands shall speak, and their feet bear witness concerning that which they have earned.’ [surah yasin/v.65 ]
therefore, it should always be a written debate with such people so that they cannot slither away, or change their tack. many people make this mistake and they argue with wahabis and others on such furuyi matters. infact, wahabi, qadiani, ghayr-muqallid and others want to argue on extraneous matters, instead of principles. one should never allow them to spring this trap – tell them to first come within the boundaries of islām and prove yourselves as muslims and then argue on such extraneous matters. [1]
[FONT="]1. note that alaHazrat was talking about wahabis of his time who had notoriously insulted RasūlAllāh şallAllāhu álayhi wa sallam by their words and stubbornly refused to repent. i suppose this doesn’t apply to the clueless wahabis of our age. Allāh táālā knows best.[/FONT]
Last edited:
