As-salamu 'alaykum brother Muhammadi
First, please note, that I am not against Mufakkir-e-Islam at all and I am not "anything" to discuss with such a great scholar.
But I received some comments to the video from a brother I sent the video, which I hope you can bring to Shah sahib to get a comment on as I am not able to answer them or check it myself - not having the book.
His general point is that Shah sahib mixes talking about ijma ummat and ijma among the sunnis.
I will bring some quotes from his mail:
1) "The passage in Maqalat al-Islamiyyin refers to the positions of the Muslims as a whole, including the Mu`tazila, Shi`a and Khawarij, and not just Ahl al-Sunna."
Shah sahib says when reading it that it is about different opinions inside Ahl al-Sunna. Is he describing different opinions among the sunnis or all muslim groups in that passage?
2) "As for the passage quoting Ibn `Abbas it is from Muruj al-Dhahab by al-Mas`udi, a Shi`i Mu`tazili as Ibn Hajar described him in Lisan al-Mizan (4:225), and he specifically lambasted that writer's position on the tafdil of Sayyidina `Ali; on top of which this report is chainless and its Arabic is incoherent."
?
Moreover he writes about the position of Imam al-Ash'ari:
"Imam al-Ash`ari states the Sunni Ijma` that Abu Bakr is the best of this Umma after the Prophet, upon him blessings and peace, in al-Ibana and in Ijma` 46 of his Risala ila Ahl al-Thaghr, and it is his own position `aqlan as well as confirmed by Imam Abu Mansur al-Baghdadi in the section on tafdil in his book Usul al-Din. Imam al-Ash`ari even considered that the proof for the primacy of Abu Bakr and `Umar, Allah be well-pleased with them, is in the Qur'an, as shown from the conclusion of his Luma`."
I hope you can get a response for this
Jazakallahu khayra
Allah Hafiz
First, please note, that I am not against Mufakkir-e-Islam at all and I am not "anything" to discuss with such a great scholar.
But I received some comments to the video from a brother I sent the video, which I hope you can bring to Shah sahib to get a comment on as I am not able to answer them or check it myself - not having the book.
His general point is that Shah sahib mixes talking about ijma ummat and ijma among the sunnis.
I will bring some quotes from his mail:
1) "The passage in Maqalat al-Islamiyyin refers to the positions of the Muslims as a whole, including the Mu`tazila, Shi`a and Khawarij, and not just Ahl al-Sunna."
Shah sahib says when reading it that it is about different opinions inside Ahl al-Sunna. Is he describing different opinions among the sunnis or all muslim groups in that passage?
2) "As for the passage quoting Ibn `Abbas it is from Muruj al-Dhahab by al-Mas`udi, a Shi`i Mu`tazili as Ibn Hajar described him in Lisan al-Mizan (4:225), and he specifically lambasted that writer's position on the tafdil of Sayyidina `Ali; on top of which this report is chainless and its Arabic is incoherent."
?
Moreover he writes about the position of Imam al-Ash'ari:
"Imam al-Ash`ari states the Sunni Ijma` that Abu Bakr is the best of this Umma after the Prophet, upon him blessings and peace, in al-Ibana and in Ijma` 46 of his Risala ila Ahl al-Thaghr, and it is his own position `aqlan as well as confirmed by Imam Abu Mansur al-Baghdadi in the section on tafdil in his book Usul al-Din. Imam al-Ash`ari even considered that the proof for the primacy of Abu Bakr and `Umar, Allah be well-pleased with them, is in the Qur'an, as shown from the conclusion of his Luma`."
I hope you can get a response for this
Allah Hafiz