Deobandi Fabrication in Sirat al mustaqeem

S

sunnistudent

sunniport user
Deobandi Fabrication in Sirat al mustaqeem



The forefather of Deobandi Jamat , Ismail Dehalvee said in his book Sirat al mustaqeem:

“ To get the thought of Prophet ( sal allahu alaihi wa sallam) in salah( prayer) is WORSE than getting the thought of Ox and Horse.”
Urdu : Khwa janab risalat maab hee hon, apani himmat ko laga dena apany bayl aur gadhey ki surat mein mustagriq honay say ZYADAH bura hai


The urdu word ‘zyadah” was originally used by Ismaeel Dehalvi to COMPARE the thought of prophet [ sal allahu alayhi wa sallam] with the thought of Ox and Donkey in salah ( prayer)
This was analysed at the below link

http://www.falaah.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=96:thought-of-prophet-in-prayer--a-must-&catid=46:wahabi&Itemid=99

In 1998 edition of this book, this word”zyadah” has been removed.

Source : http://www.falaah.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=161:deobandi-fabrication-in-sirat-al-mustaqeem&catid=42:fabrications&Itemid=92
 
Jazakamullah for the refutation of the Deobandiya heretic sect.
 
The video (with arabic translation) should definitely be spread amongst arab ulema and students of knowledge and their responses taken in writing/on video- then let's see how they try to weasel out of it.
 
Some posters here may actually have direct links with arab shuykuh- perhaps get their responses in writing/video? The more awareness that is spread, the better.

For too long, these fools have pulled the wool over the eyes of non desi's- when video/audio evidence is put to them (and the ability of the shuyukh to get their own translators if their is a claim that the video is inaccurate), then where will the deo's run?
 
Khanah said:
Some posters here may actually have direct links with arab shuykuh- perhaps get their responses in writing/video? The more awareness that is spread, the better.

For too long, these fools have pulled the wool over the eyes of non desi's- when video/audio evidence is put to them (and the ability of the shuyukh to get their own translators if their is a claim that the video is inaccurate), then where will the deo's run?
Click to expand...

The Arab ulema are not interested in this dispute and the deos have done their work in this regard. What Sunnis should've focussed on was propagating 'Brelwi' beliefs as that would've got have got more traction from the Arab ulema and at the same time would've exposed the deos.
 
Waqar786 said:
Sunnis should've focussed on was propagating 'Brelwi' beliefs
Click to expand...
Only one scholar form india i saw who really was into this was Mufti Akhter Rida Alaihir Rahma who translated works of Alahazrat and presented them to Arab ulema.
He also invited arab shuyookh to speak in URS E RIDAWI.
Mufti shamsul huda mentions how he invited SAYYID ALAWI AL MAKKI to barrielly in 2003.
 
ONE of the biggest problem with sunnis is that we do not have good marketing skills or PR management like that of all other groups, especially the devbandis.

al-isha'ah of shaykh muhammad ibn abdu'r rasul barzanji is printed with "annotations of kandhelwi"

see here, here.

----
the book has hardly fifty annotations in a book of about 425+ pages. [i counted page by page and listed them at 49; one or two might've been overlooked]. i have given a sample of 15 from the 49 which is 30% of all notes. what could probably be the lengthiest note is also shown (see sample #2 below).

these annotations are generic notes one makes when reading - i too make many of them and since i hate to write on books i use sticky notes.
i do not deny that such notes of prominent scholars are useful and could be insightful. given below are samples from my copy:

zak1.png



zk1.png


zk2.png




=====
it is fine. i do not deny that a scholar's marginal notes are also useful. but the hypocrisy of devbandi wahabis is that they would taunt us that alahazrat's "maginalia" is about few markings he had made on his copies of books and mock at it; whereas alahazrat's notes are far more in number than these and are far more insightful. yes, alahazrat's annotations also have cross references similar to above.

my point is that deos make a big show of small things; but their hypocrisy is that if we do the same to SOME of alahazrat's books they dismiss it. not to mention alahazrat's written corpus, even a portion of which is published is so much and so rich that only an intentionally blind or a jahil or a jealous person can deny the greatness.

abul hasan nadwi and other devbandi were both juhala and hasidin. juhala because they were deprived of the good fortune of reading alahazrat's books; hasidin is that the poisoned the pond. may Allah taala give them their just recompense. may Allah ta'ala deal with the liars abul hasan nadwi, khalid mahmud and the DESERVING OF DAMNATION, ihsan ilahi zahier (alayhi ma alayhi) with His `adl.

---
we are catching up. and in sha'Allah deobandis will have heartburn soon.
wa billahi't tawfiq.
 
Last edited:
May Allah bless the shaykh

I understand hamza maqbul studied under murabit Al hajj. Shaykh siddina, a fellow student of his, spends a lot of time in America, perhaps he could be approached? Although the deobandi already consider him to be a barelwi and whatnot.

The more neutral scholars who come out against these fools, the better. The more of them who wake up to this fitna, the better
 
A longer version of Shaykh Salek's response to what Abdur Raheem Limbada said has been uploaded on to YouTube. The two important parts start from 07:00 and 21:15. Please share Shaykh Salek's response with others.

 
Well done to the brothers capturing the responses of the scholars on video. Some of these deobandis, such as hamza maqbul, have studied under these Arab scholars. Now perhaps some of them will see with clear eyes the realities of their 'students'.

And a refutation that comes from their teachers and those they respect is more impactful than one from the 'barelwis'. Hopefully the laymen amongst the deobandis will see these videos and open their eyes also.

Perhaps if Ala Hazrat had written Hussam today, he would have gathered the attestations of the scholars on video too, due to the need of the times and to leave no doubt.

My speculation
 
الشيخ سالك بن سيدنا الموريتاني حفظه الله يبين الحكم على قول الديوبندية:

"التفكير عن حمار في صلاتك أفضل من التفكير عن رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم"

قائلا: "هذا كفر صريح!"

معاذ الله

Shaykh Sālik ibn Siddīna (may Allāh preserve him) explains the legal ruling on the vile statement of the Deobandīs:

"Thinking about a donkey in your prayer is better than thinking about the Prophet ﷺ"

معاذ الله

Saying: "This is clear kufr!"

https://www.facebook.com/728350647/posts/10165468909275648/
 
Hassan_0123 said:
https://t.me/RealityOfTheDeobandis/597
Click to expand...

Saw a message on this telegram group

I have been given permission to share this message from someone close to Shaykh Salek, may Allah preserve Him.
The Deobandis in America have been trying to take down Shaykh Salek for speaking the truth and for refuting them.
May Allah preserve Shaykh Salek Bin Siddina and give him a long and healthy life and grant him safety. آمين
*The name and picture was blacked out because I wasn't given permission to share who said this but I was given permission to share what he said.
Click to expand...

Screenshot_20211108-221126.png
 
The Shaykh said how can someone from the subcontinent say that thinking about cows/bulls during salah is a deterrent to shirk? - it's actually the land where cows are worshipped!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top