Shias and Rafidis

Wadood

sunniport user
sunnistudent said:
In House Takfir: From deobandis upon deobandis
Sullah Kullis are those people who are spreading fitnah in this ummah. They often say that sunni scholars were “too harsh” in issuing the verdict of kufr against those who showed disrespect to prophet ( sal allahu alayhi wa sallam). Sullah Kulli literary means: “promoters of peace”. But in reality these people are hypocrites who are damaging the creed of islam by not calling a spade as spade. These people sometimes go to the extent of calling rafidi shias also as muslim!
These “sulah kullis ” should read the below mentioned verdict of kufr from deobandis upon deobandis and ask Allah to guide them to deen e islam as practiced by ahlus sunnah wal jama’ah. Ameen


assalamu 'alaykum brother sunnistudent,

I agree that we should call a spade a spade. But you just called 70% of my country Iran as non-Muslim. Do you know that 70% of Iran is rafdi shia?

Mashad, where some of my relatives live, is a rafidi shia city of 5 million. I do not have the ability to label ALL of them outside the fold of Islam.

I just cannot.

Is it true that Iran is home to 70 million non-Muslim rafidi shias? They do all go to Hajj you know. They do say the kalima.
 
Walekum as salam wa rahmatullah bro Wadood.

Many sunni muftis have decalred rafidi shias to be out side the fold of Islam. Shah Waliullah muhaditth al dehalvi[rh] writes in the beginning of al intibah fi salasil awliya Allah , that the belief of imams being masum is enough to make a person go outside the fold of islam because as per islam only prophets are masum. So if any one considers other than prophets to be masum , he is outside the fold of Islam.

We know even an aalim cannot issue the fatwa. Only a mufti can do that.

Imam Ahmed Rida Khan [rh] clearly states in his fatwa that rafidi shias are outside the fold of Islam. He has given the definition of “rafidi shia” before issuing this verdict.

I only mentioned the fatwa of sunni muftis upon rafidi shias. I have no authority to issue a fatwa.


Mulla Ali al Qari (rh) writes in his sharah of al fiqh al akbar that if some one recites kalmia but denies essentials of deen e islam , then that person can not be called as muslim. Qadyanis also recite kalmia and perform salah facing qibla.
 
Is there an ijma' of our elders that all rawafid are kafirs?

I think this issue of wholesale takfir of entire populations of millions and millions should be handled properly. I do not believe our Sunni elders engaged in blanket takfir of this sort.

millions of children are born in Iran every year. Most of them are born in rafidi shia families. They grow up being rafidi shias. But they are not even aware of the correct aqida of the sunni muslims. They dont even know what a Sunni is, only that Sunnis are misguided Muslims. They proudly say the Kalimah and raise money to go for Hajj and Umra.

They go to Hajj, you might see them everywhere throughout the year as well.

qadyanis are banned from hajj.

I remember Shaykh Muhammad al-Ya'qoubi speak for support of Hezbulla (100% rafidi shias), when Israel was bombing hezbulla in lebanon. I remember his speech. He called them 'Muslims', and urged us Sunnis to support hezbulla in the fight against the oppressor. I remember it clearly. Even though I know myself, how evil, and oppressive and full of kufr hezbulla itself is.
 
I have also seen the Habaib of Yemen and Hijaz sit shoulder to shoulder with rafidi shias. Including Shaykh 'Alawi al-Maliki, especially with those in Madina.

I also attended Habib Ali's da'wa meeting, in which he invited the rafiDi shia religious families of Kuwait, al-aHsa, Bahrain to listen to him. Later he greeted them with "salam 'alaykum" and sat next to them.

I personally do not agree with these activities of Habib 'Ali, as I believe the Twelver Shia rafidis should be shunned.

But, the above article basically means Habib Ali is also a "sullah kulli". This is the language of sunni tiger, the sidekick of KS on sunnitalk.
 
1. Imam Ahmed Raza Khan (rh) has written a book refuting rafidi shias. The name of the book is Radd ar-Rafadah. This book is online. Those interested can read and see how Imam Ahmed Raza Khan has given his verdict of Kufr upon Rafidi shias.


2. Those who do not want to accept Imam Ahmed Raza Khan can read Fatwa Alamgiri ( also known as Fatwa al hindiya). This was written by about 15 most qualified sunni ( mostly Hanafi) scholars of the subcontinent of their time. One of the author was Shah Abdur raheem (rh) who was the father of Shah Waliullah Muhaddith al dehalvi (rh).

Imam Ahmed Raza Khan quotes this and writes:( Fatwa Radhiwiya, Vol 13 , Kitab al Talaq)

عالمگیریہ میں ہے:یجب اکفارالروافض فی قولھم (وعد بعض عقائد ھم المکفرۃ وقال)وھٰؤلاء القوم خارجون عن ملۃ الاسلام واحکامھم احکام المرتدین کذافی الظھیریۃ۔۱؎
رافضیوں کو کافر قرار دینا ضروری ہے ان کے عقائد کی بابت (یہاں روافض کے بعد عقائد کفر یہ ذکر کرکے ہندیہ میں فرمایا کہ) یہ قوم ملت اسلامیہ سے خارج ہے، اور ان کے احکام مرتدین جیسے ہوں گے جیسا کہ ظہیریہ میں ہے۔(ت)
(۱؎ فتاوی ہندیۃ الباب التاسع فی احکام المرتدین نورانی کتب خانہ پشاور ۲ /۲۶۴)


English Translation: It is necessary to decalre kufr upon Rafidi because of their aqida ( beleif). This sect if out of the fold of millat e islamiya and their ruling is like the ruling for muratds ( apostate).


3. Shah Waliullah Muhaddith dehalvi (rh) has also called these rafidis as non muslims in al intibah fi salasil awliya Allah.


4. Those interested can also read Radd e Rawafid by Imam Rabbani Mujaddid alfe thani (rh).

5. Since the topic is not to provide quotes of scholars upon rafidis , I am not quoting other scholars.
 
Brother sunnistudent, it is not a game about accepting or not accepting. We do have a fatwa from Imam Ahmad RiDa Khan radiallahu anhu, and this is what it says:

Answer: [fatawa riDawiyyah, kitab an-nikah; vol.11/pg345, Lahore edition]

Shi`ah fall into three categories:

1. ghâli (ghulât): they repudiate the necessities of religion. for example:

a) to believe that qur'ân is incomplete.
b) to call it 'book of `uthmân'.
c) elevate sayyiduna `ali karram Allâhu wajhah and other imâms above the prophets salawâtAllâhi `alayhim wat taslîm.
d) if these imâms are held to be higher than even ONE prophet.
e) to allege that Allâh `azza wa jall was regretful after issuing a command and hence remorsefully, changed His earlier ruling
f) to allege that Allâh didn't realize the wisdom of a certain ruling (or the lack of it) and when He realized it, He changed the rule.
g) to allege that RasûlAllâh SallAllâhu `alayhi wa sallam practised taqiyyah in the course of his tabligh

those who hold the above and other such statements that amount to disbelief are kâfirs by ijmâ`a. all dealings with them are similar to those with apostates. it is in fatâwâ DHahîriyyah, fatâwâ hindiyyah, Hadiqatun Nadiyyah: [aHkâmuhum aHkâm al-murtaddîn] they are to be dealt with as apostates.

nowadays, most of the rafiDis fall into this category. their scholars and commoners, men and woman all of them seem to profess the aforementioned beliefs, except Allâh willing otherwise.

a woman with such beliefs is an apostate. a Muslim cannot marry her, nor a kafir nor an apostate. if a Muslim marries her and has intercourse, it is fornication. and a child born of such a relation is illegal and considered as a bastard.

--

2. tabarrâyi (sabbiyyah) : they don't profess such egregious beliefs but indulge in abusing the SaHâbah.

some people among this group reject the khilâfah of the shaykhayn raDiyAllâhu `anhumâ. these people are considered kâfir among the fuqahâ as is evident from khulâSah, hindiyyah etc. *BUT* the correct ruling is that of the mutakallimîn and that is they are bid`yis – subject to hell and dogs of hell – but not kâfirs. to marry a woman who belongs to this group, is valid but is profusely disliked. because it is from the Hadîth 'laa tanâkihûhum' / don't marry the people of bid`ah.

it is in SaHîH Hadîth that a man cursed a she-camel. RasûlAllâh SallAllâhu `alayhi wa sallam told them to leave the she-camel since it had become accursed. after this nobody ever touched that she camel (muslim).

it should be noted that a she-camel, is in no way liable to be cursed. it doesn't deserve to be cursed. but a tabarrayi rafiDi who curses the shaykhayn is himself cursed by Allâh. "these are the people who are damned by Allâh, and the damnation of the damners upon them" (2:159)

hence it is not desirable to live with a woman who is accursed (because of her cursing the shaykhayn).

---

3. tafDîli (tafDîlîyyah): this group revers all the companions; the accept the leadership of all the four Caliphs raDiyAllâhu ta`âlâ `anhum; but just elevate the position of `Ali raDiyAllahu `anhu above all others.

these people are nowhere near kufr. however it is bid`ah to do so (consider `Ali higher than others).

to marry such a woman is permitted (without any difference among fuqaha), yet it is disliked. if being with her may influence one's opinion of ahlus-sunnah, the dislikeability would increase to the point of prohibitively disliked (makrûh taHrîmi).

And Allâh sub-Hânahu wa ta`âlâ knows best.
 
I have Imam Rabbani Mujaddid alf Thani raDyAllahu 'anhu discussion with me. Also, the scholars of Afghanistan say the exact same thing that Imam Ahmad RiDa Khan has said regarding the rawafid.
 
Brother Wadood, that fatwa does not talk about Rafids. It talks about different types of shias and marriage of a sunni male with a shia woman. Then Imam Ahmed Raza Khan (rh) describes different type of shia group.

Where as the fatwa which I have quotes clearly gives the fatwa of kufr upon rafidis.

If you want to know other fatwa from Imam Ahmed Raza on marriage with shia, please read this.



مسئلہ ۲۴۱: از ضلع بہڑائچ محلہ ناظرہ پورہ بمکان سید منصب علی صاحب عرضی نویس مرسلہ سید نصیر الدین صاحب ۲۴ ربیع الآخر ۱۳۳۶ھ
زید،مذہب اہل سنت والجماعت نے ایک عورت شیعہ کے مطابق مذہب شیعہ صیغہ پڑھایا اور نکاح بطریق اہلسنت نہیں کیا اور مدۃ العمر دونوں اپنے اپنے مذہب پر قائم رہے،ایسی حالت میں جو اولاد ہوئی وہ جائز یا ناجائز؟ بینو ا تو جروا

الجواب: آج کل تبرائی رافضی علی العموم مرتدین ہیں اور مرتدخواہ مرد خواہ عورت سے دنیابھر میں کسی کا نکاح نہیں ہوسکتا۔ جو کچھ اولاد ہوگی ولد الحلال نہیں ہوسکتی،

عالمگیر ی میں فتاوٰی ظہیریہ سے ہے:یجب اکفار الروافض فی قولھم برجعۃ الاموات الی الدنیا ان قال واحکامھم احکام المرتدین ۳؎۔

رافضیوں کے اس قول پر کہ ''فوت شدہ لوگ دنیا میں پھر واپس آئیں گے'' ان کی تکفیر واجب ہے اور یہاں تک کہ انھوں نے فرمایا کہ ان کے احکام مرتدین والے ہیں۔ (ت)

(۳؎ فتاوٰی ہندیہ باب فی احکام المرتدین نورانی کتب خانہ پشاور ۲/۲۶۴)

اسی میں مبسوط سے ہے:لایجوز للمرتدان یتزوج مرتدۃ ولامسلمۃ ولاکافرۃ اصلیۃ وکذلک لایجوز نکاح المرتدۃ مع احد۱؎۔

مرتد کو کسی مرتدہ عورت یا مسلمان یا اصلی کافرعورت سے نکاح کرنا جائزنہیں اور یوں ہی مرتدہ عورت کابھی کسی ایک سے نکاح جائزنہیں۔ (ت)

( ۱؎ فتاوٰی خیریہ فصل فی المحرمات بالشرک نورانی کتب پشاور ۱/۲۸۲)

اس کے بعد صیغہ ونکاح کی بحث کی کچھ حاجت نہیں، سنیوں کے طورپر نکاح ہوتا تو کب ہوسکتا۔ واللہ تعالٰی اعلم


Else where Imam Ahmed Raza Khan writes:


عالمگیر ی میں فتاوٰی ظہیریہ سے ہے:یجب اکفار الروافض فی قولھم برجعۃ الاموات الی الدنیا ان قال واحکامھم احکام المرتدین ۳؎۔

رافضیوں کے اس قول پر کہ ''فوت شدہ لوگ دنیا میں پھر واپس آئیں گے'' ان کی تکفیر واجب ہے اور یہاں تک کہ انھوں نے فرمایا کہ ان کے احکام مرتدین والے ہیں۔ (ت)

(۳؎ فتاوٰی ہندیہ باب فی احکام المرتدین نورانی کتب خانہ پشاور ۲/۲۶۴)
Imam Ahmed Raza Khan writes : It is stated in Fatwa al hindiya from Fatwa al dhahiriya: The statement of the rafidis that”dead people will come again in this world:’’ makes it incumbent ( wajib) to make takfir upon them and they also said that these people ( rafidis) should be handled as per murtads.
----
More can be read in Radd ar Rafadah which is online
 
Brother Sunnistudent, This fatwa of Imam Ahmad Rida Khan clearly mentions rafidis, and their three categories. It is shias who are rafidis. No one else. Is English the problem?

Answer: [fatawa riDawiyyah, kitab an-nikah; vol.11/pg345, Lahore edition]

Shi`ah fall into three categories:

1. ghâli (ghulât): they repudiate the necessities of religion. for example:

a) to believe that qur'ân is incomplete.
b) to call it 'book of `uthmân'.
c) elevate sayyiduna `ali karram Allâhu wajhah and other imâms above the prophets salawâtAllâhi `alayhim wat taslîm.
d) if these imâms are held to be higher than even ONE prophet.
e) to allege that Allâh `azza wa jall was regretful after issuing a command and hence remorsefully, changed His earlier ruling
f) to allege that Allâh didn't realize the wisdom of a certain ruling (or the lack of it) and when He realized it, He changed the rule.
g) to allege that RasûlAllâh SallAllâhu `alayhi wa sallam practised taqiyyah in the course of his tabligh

those who hold the above and other such statements that amount to disbelief are kâfirs by ijmâ`a. all dealings with them are similar to those with apostates. it is in fatâwâ DHahîriyyah, fatâwâ hindiyyah, Hadiqatun Nadiyyah: [aHkâmuhum aHkâm al-murtaddîn] they are to be dealt with as apostates.

nowadays, most of the rafiDis fall into this category. their scholars and commoners, men and woman all of them seem to profess the aforementioned beliefs, except Allâh willing otherwise.

a woman with such beliefs is an apostate. a Muslim cannot marry her, nor a kafir nor an apostate. if a Muslim marries her and has intercourse, it is fornication. and a child born of such a relation is illegal and considered as a bastard.

--

2. tabarrâyi (sabbiyyah) : they don't profess such egregious beliefs but indulge in abusing the SaHâbah.

some people among this group reject the khilâfah of the shaykhayn raDiyAllâhu `anhumâ. these people are considered kâfir among the fuqahâ as is evident from khulâSah, hindiyyah etc. *BUT* the correct ruling is that of the mutakallimîn and that is they are bid`yis – subject to hell and dogs of hell – but not kâfirs. to marry a woman who belongs to this group, is valid but is profusely disliked. because it is from the Hadîth 'laa tanâkihûhum' / don't marry the people of bid`ah.

it is in SaHîH Hadîth that a man cursed a she-camel. RasûlAllâh SallAllâhu `alayhi wa sallam told them to leave the she-camel since it had become accursed. after this nobody ever touched that she camel (muslim).

it should be noted that a she-camel, is in no way liable to be cursed. it doesn't deserve to be cursed. but a tabarrayi rafiDi who curses the shaykhayn is himself cursed by Allâh. "these are the people who are damned by Allâh, and the damnation of the damners upon them" (2:159)

hence it is not desirable to live with a woman who is accursed (because of her cursing the shaykhayn).

---

3. tafDîli (tafDîlîyyah): this group revers all the companions; the accept the leadership of all the four Caliphs raDiyAllâhu ta`âlâ `anhum; but just elevate the position of `Ali raDiyAllahu `anhu above all others.

these people are nowhere near kufr. however it is bid`ah to do so (consider `Ali higher than others).

to marry such a woman is permitted (without any difference among fuqaha), yet it is disliked. if being with her may influence one's opinion of ahlus-sunnah, the dislikeability would increase to the point of prohibitively disliked (makrûh taHrîmi).

And Allâh sub-Hânahu wa ta`âlâ knows best.
 
Imam RiDa has clearly mentioned Tabarri's in his fatwa above. Which tabarrai's are those? A different one? Tabarra of the Shaykhayn is the prime sign of rafD
 
Also, rafidi shia scholars in Najaf/Qom believe it kufr to hold the belief "those who die will return back to earth", as far as I am aware.
 
Brother Sunnistudent, This fatwa of Imam Ahmad Rida Khan clearly mentions rafidis, and their three categories. It is shias who are rafidis. No one else. Is English the problem?

Brother. you are again quoting a fatwa which has described beleif of different sect of shia and marriage of a sunni male with a shia woman.

I have given you clear fatwa from Imam which has stated kufr upon rafidis.

Imam Ahmed Raza Khan writes that Rafidis are disassociated from the boundary of Islam (Millat-e-Islamia) and they are regarded as APOSTATES. (FATAWAH RAZVEEIAH, VOL. 6, PAGE 25, Old edition)

Imam Ahmed Raza Khan also writes:
لہذا جز م کیا جاتا ہے کہ آج کل رافضیرافضیوںوں میں کوئی مسلمان ملنا ایسا ہی مشکل ہے جیسا کوّوں میں سپید رنگ و

The chances of finding muslim among rafidis is just like the chances of getting a white crow from crows!

 
Wadood said:
Also, rafidi shia scholars in Najaf/Qom believe it kufr to hold the belief "those who die will return back to earth", as far as I am aware.

Brother, that is why it was suggested to read Radd ar Rafadah in which Imam Ahmed Raza Khan has first listed the criteria for calling some one as :rafidi.

Some one may come and say "in my region rafidis praise Abu Bakr siddiq (rd)"! There fore it is necessary to read Radd ar Rafadah in which Imam sahab has listed the condition and then declared Kufr upon rafidis.

Radd ar Rafadah can be read here

www.razanw.org/modules/alahazratbooks/item.php?itemid=127
 
This can also be read


this is from Radd ar-Rafađah, p.2-9 which can be read here.

--------------------

It is evident that those Rafidis [tabarra’i] who insult Abu Bakr and ‘Umar radiyAllahu ta’ala ‘anhuma – even if they deny them being Imams and Khulafa – are definitely Kafirs according to relied upon books of the Hanafi school and the explicit writings of the jurists. It is in Durr al-Mukhtar that:

If he is a denier of any necessity of faith, then he is a Kafir. Such as saying that Allah has a body or denies that Abu Bakr Siddiq radiyAllahu ta’ala ‘anhu is a companion [Durr al-Mukhtar, 1:83].

Tahtawi, commentary of Durr adds:

And denying his Khilafah is also Kufr [Tahtawi, 1:244].

Fatawa Khulasa and Khazanat al-Muftin mention that:

If Rafidis consider Mawla ‘Ali radiyAllahu ta'ala 'anhu to be greater than all the companions; then they are innovators and astray. If they deny the Khilafah of Siddiq radiyAllahu ta'ala 'anhu; then they are Kafir [Khazanat al-Muftin, 1:28].

It is in Fath al-Qadir and Hashiya Tabyeen that:

If any Rafidi considers Mawla ‘Ali radiyAllahu ta'ala 'anhu to be Afdal [greater] than the first three Khulafa; then he is astray and if he denies the Khilafah of Siddiq or Faruq radiyAllahu ta'ala 'anhuma, then he is a Kafir [Hashiya Shalbi ‘ala Tabyeen al-Haqayiq, 1:135].

It is in Wajiz of Imam Kardari that:

The denier of the Khilafah of Abu Bakr radiyAllahu ta'ala 'anhu is a Kafir, this is authentic. The denier of the Khilafah of ‘Umar radiyAllahu ta'ala 'anhu is also a Kafir. This is most authentic [Fatawa Bazzaziya, 6:318].

It is in Tabyeen al-Haqayiq Sharh Kanz al-Daqayiq that:

Imam Mirghinani said that salah behind an innovator will be valid but not valid behind a Rafidi, Jahmi, Qadari, Tashbahi. It is gathered from this that if someone’s innovation is not to the extent that he is a Kafir, then salah behind him will be valid but Makruh and if it does reach Kufr, then it is not valid at all [Tabyeen al-Haqayiq, 1:134].

It is in Fatawa Hindiya that:

The same is in Tabyeen al-Haqayiq and Khulasa and it is authentic. The same is in Badayi’ [Fatawa Hindiya, 1:84].

Also in Hindiya [3:264], Bazzaziya [3:319], al-Ashbah [Kitab al-Siyar], Ithaf al-Absar wa’l Basayir [p.187], Fatawa Anqarwiya [1:25]and Waqiyat al-Muftin [p.13]that:

Rafidis that speak ill of Shaykhayn radiyAllahu ta'ala 'anhuma [al ‘ayadhu billah] are Kafir. If they consider Mawla ‘Ali radiyAllahu ta'ala 'anhu to be greater than Abu Bakr and ‘Umar radiyAllahu ta'ala 'anhuma, then he is an innovator and not a Kafir.

It is on the same page of Bazzaziya and in Barjandi Sharh Nuqaya [4:21] from Fatawa Zahiriya that:

The denier of the Imamah of Abu Bakr Siddiq radiyAllahu ta'ala 'anhu is a kafir. Some said he is an innovator and not a Kafir; but the authentic position is that he is a Kafir. Similarly, the denier of the Khilafah of ‘Umar radiyAllahu ta'ala 'anhu is also a Kafir according to the authentic narrations.

Bazzaziya also has that:

It is Wajib [necessary] to call Rafidis, Nasibis and Kharijis as Kafir because they say Amir al-Mu’minin ‘Uthman, Mawla ‘Ali, Talha, Zubair and Sayyida ‘Aisha were all Kafirs [Bazzaziya, 6:318].

It is in Bahr al-Rayiq that:

The most authentic position is that the denier of the Khilafah and Imamah of Abu Bakr and ‘Umar radiyAllahu ta'ala 'anhuma is a Kafir [Bahr al-Rayiq, 5:121].

It is in Majma’ al-Anhur Sharh Multaqa al-Abhur that:

If Rafidis are only Tafdilis, then they are innovators and if they deny the Khilafah of Siddiq, they are Kafir [Majma’ al-Anhar, 1:108].

From the same book:

Whoever denies the companionship of Abu Bakr radiyAllahu ta'ala 'anhu is a Kafir. Likewise, whoever denies that he is the rightful Imam, he is a Kafir according to the most authentic position. Similarly, whoever denies the companionship of ‘Umar radiyAllahu ta'ala 'anhu is a Kafir in the most authentic reports [Majma’ al-Anhar, 1:631].

It is in Ghunya Sharh Munya that:

An innovator is someone who holds any belief that contradicts the Ahlu’s Sunnah wa’l Jama’ah. Praying behind him valid whilst being Makruh until his belief does not reach Kufr according to the Ahlu’s Sunnah. If it does, then praying behind him is invalid. Such as the Rafidis who say Mawla’ Ali is God or that prophethood was for ‘Ali and Jibra’il made a mistake. Such beliefs are Kufr and so is accusing Sayyida ‘Aisha or to deny the companionship and Khilafah of Siddiq radiyAllahu ta'ala 'anhu or to speak ill of Shaykhayn radiyAllahu ta'ala 'anhuma [Ghunyat al-Musalli, p.515].

It is in Kifaya Sharh Hidaya [1:305] and Mustakhlas al-Haqayiq Sharh Kanz al-Daqayiq that:

If a Kafir innovates, such as a Jahmi or Qadari who say the Qur’an is created or a Rafidi who denies the Khilafah of Abu Bakr radiyAllahu ta'ala 'anhu, then praying behind him is not allowed [Mustakhlas al-Haqayiq, 1:202].

It is in Sharh Kanz ‘ala Fath al-Muyin that:

It is in Khulasa that salah is valid behind innovators apart from the Jahmiya, Jabriya, QaDurriya, Rafidi Ghali, those who believe the Qur’an is created and the Mushabbiha. Salah is valid, but Makruh, behind the Ahl Qibla as long as their innovation does not reach Kufr such that they are not Ghali. And a Rafidi Ghali is someone who denies the Khilafah of Abu Bakr radiyAllahu ta'ala 'anhu [Sharh Kanz ‘ala Fath al-Muyin, 1:208].

It is n Tahtawi ‘ala Maraqi al-Falah that:

The denier of the Khilafah of Siddiq radiyAllahu ta'ala 'anhu is a Kafir. And Fath al-Qadir says the same for the denier of the Khilafah of ‘Umar radiyAllahu ta'ala 'anhu. Burhan Sharh Mawahib al-Rahman says the same for the denier of the Khilafah of ‘Uthman and salah behind someone who denies the wiping of the socks or the companionship of Abu Bakr radiyAllahu ta'ala 'anhu or speaks ill of Shaykhayn or accuses ‘Aisha Siddiqq radiyAllahu ta'ala 'anha and is also invalid behind anyone who denies any necessity of faith as he is Kafir. His explanation will not be heard nor will his excuse that he said so due to a mistaken opinion [Tahtawi ‘ala Maraqi al-Falah, p.168].

It is in Nazm al-Farayid of ‘Allama ibn Wahban that:

Whoever curses or speaks ill of Shaykhayn is a Kafir. An even greater Kafir is someone who says that Yadullah means ‘hand’. The most accurate opinion for someone who denies the Khilafah of Abu Bakr radiyAllahu ta'ala 'anhu is Takfir and this is the same for the Khilafah of ‘Umar radiyAllahu ta'ala 'anhu.

It is in Tayseer al-Maqasid that:

If a Rafidi speaks ill of Shaykhayn radiyAllahu ta'ala 'anhuma and curses them will become a Kafir. If he believes that Mawla ‘Ali radiyAllahu ta'ala 'anhu is greater than them, then he is not a Kafir but astray and an innovator.

It continues:

According to the most authentic way, the denier of the Khilafah of Siddiq radiyAllahu ta'ala 'anhu is a Kafir. And the same is for the Khilafah of ‘Umar radiyAllahu ta'ala 'anhu.

It is in Fatwa ‘Allama Nuh Afandi, Majmu’a Shaykh al-Islam ‘Ubaid Allah Afandi, Mughni al-Mustafti ‘an Su’al al-Mufti and ‘Uqud al-Durriya that:

Rafidis are Kafirs. They hold many beliefs of Kufr. They deny the Khilafah of Shaykhayn and speak ill of them. May Allah blacken their faces in both worlds. Whoever has any of their characteristics is a Kafir [‘Uqud al-Durriya, 1:103].

It continues:

To speak ill of Shaykhayn radiyAllahu ta'ala 'anhuma is the same as disrespecting RasulAllah sallAllahu 'alaihi wasallam. Imam Sadr Shaheed said: Whoever speaks ill or curses Shaykhayn is a Kafir [‘Uqud al-Durriya, 1:104].

It also has that:

The scholars of the ‘Uthmani era always had divine help with them. Whoever among them was the Akabir Shaykh al-Islam wrote fatawa against the Shi’a. Many of them wrote extensively and compiled monographs. It was the Muhaqqiq and Mufassir, Abu Mas’ud Afandi ‘Imadi [leading Mufti, ‘Uthmani era], who gave the fatwa of the Rafidis’ Kufr and apostacy. His fatwa has been recorded by ‘Allama Kawakibi Halabi in his commentary of Farayid Sunniya [‘Uqud al-Durriya, 1:105].

Ashbah, Ithaf [p.187], Anqarwi [p.25] and Waqiyat al-Muftin [p.13] all have it from Manaqib Karwari that:

Whoever denies the Khilafah of Shaykhayn or has hatred for them is a Kafir because Shaykhayn are beloved to RasulAllah sallallahu ‘alaihi wasallam [Waqiyat al-Muftin, p.13].

Moreover, many of the Akabir have explained that the Kufr of the Rafidis is such that even their repentance is not accepted. Tanweer al-Absar has it that:

The repentance of any apostate is accepted except for him who insults a Prophet or any or both of the Shaykhayn [Durr al-Mukhtar, 1:356].

It is in Ashbah wa’l Nadhayir, Fatawa Khayriya [1:94] and Ithaf al-Absar wa’l Basayir [p.186] that:

The repentance of a Kafir is accepted in both worlds but there are some Kafirs whose repentance is not accepted. One of these is someone becomes a Kafir due to insulting our Prophet or any Prophet. Another is he who becomes Kafir after speaking ill of one or both of Shaykhayn radiyallahu ta'ala 'anhuma.

It is in Durr al-Mukhtar that:

It is in Bahr al-Rayiq from Jawhara Nayyara Sharh Mukhtasar Quduri that Imam Sadr Shaheed said that whoever speaks ill of Shaykhayn radiyallahu ta'ala 'anhuma or curses them is a Kafir. His repentance is not accepted and the fatwa of Imam Dabbusi and Faqih Abu’l Laith Samarqandi is on this. And fatwa should be on this opinion. This is what is decided in Ashbah and ‘Allama Shaykh al-Islam Muhammad bin ‘Abdullah Ghazi Tamartashi maintained this [Durr al-Mukhtar, 1:357].


Source:http://www.sunniport.com/masabih/showthread.php?t=3850
 
sunnistudent said:
Brother, that is why it was suggested to read Radd ar Rafadah in which Imam Ahmed Raza Khan has first listed the criteria for calling some one as :rafidi.

Some one may come and say "in my region rafidis praise Abu Bakr siddiq (rd)"! There fore it is necessary to read Radd ar Rafadah in which Imam sahab has listed the condition and then declared Kufr upon rafidis.

Radd ar Rafadah can be read here

www.razanw.org/modules/alahazratbooks/item.php?itemid=127


If a rafidi praises Sayyiduna Abu Bakr radiallahu anhu, then he is NOT A rafidi.
 
I am quoting Imam RiDa from Radd al-Rafidah.

Imam Rida is consistent, please bare with me

It is evident that those Rafidis [tabarra’i] who insult Abu Bakr and ‘Umar radiyAllahu ta’ala ‘anhuma – even if they deny them being Imams and Khulafa – are definitely Kafirs according to relied upon books of the Hanafi school and the explicit writings of the jurists. It is in Durr al-Mukhtar that:

If he is a denier of any necessity of faith, then he is a Kafir. Such as saying that Allah has a body or denies that Abu Bakr Siddiq radiyAllahu ta’ala ‘anhu is a companion [Durr al-Mukhtar, 1:83].

Clearly, Imam Rida has said, that to deny the companionship is a matter of necessity of Deen.

As far as I know, no tabarrai shiites (twelvers or in other words rafidis) denies the companionship of Sayyiduna Abu Bakr radiallahu anhu
 
Sufficient quotes from Hanafi scholars have been provided to show their stance on Rafidis.

My intention is not to compel anyone to accept anything. I only post what the scholars have said.

Insha Allah when we shall start a thread on shias, I will post scans from shia books ( arabic/ persian and urdu) where they have cursed Sayyeda Ayesha Siddiqa (radi allahuta'ala).
 
Back
Top