imkan al-kidhb: keller tariqa notes

[Wadood]

I was reading this strange idea from a deobandi

Deviant said: Perhaps if you looked at the fact that a “square-circle” is not actually something that can exist while “lying” is, it would help you in your confusion. We know that lying does exist, while we know that it is not compulsorily existent (wajib). It is possibly existent (ja’iz). If it is ja’iz al-wujud, it falls within the realm of Allah’s qudrah, which are the ja’izat (possible things) and is exactly what His power pertains to. His power does not pertain to a “square-circle” because of square-circle just cannot possibly exist. As for “kadhib” (lying), it not only possibly exists. It “actually” exists.

And it struck me that this deobandi has taken this example of square circle right out of shaikh nuh's tariqa notes. The language is also borrowed from shaikh nuth's tariqa notes. Such cheap behaviour all done for what? To prove 'barelwis' wrong? On what exactly? Sunni Aqida? On deobandi forums they still go on with this at this very moment.

The above is approximately two years old. The deobandis in support of the rational possibility / contingent impossibility of Allah lying had been using the keller tariqa notes for their support.

It seems ibn Arabi wrote the above.

 

[abu nibras]

ignore the ones who bark and create a nuisance. they will all be caught in headlights, soon if Allah azza wa jall wills.

subHanAllahi amma yassifun

was salam

 

[Aqdas]

blasted nincompoops!

sidq [truthfulness] is wajib for Allah; therfore, it necessarily follows that it's opposite, kidhb, is muHal.

even a 10 year old can understand this.

 

[Wadood]

I want to add to what brother Aqdas said,

Sidq [truthfulness] is wajib for Allah intrinsically; therefore it necessary follows, that it's opposite, kidhb is muHaal intrinsically

 

[SunniRidwi_786]

Correction, even my 5 year old nephew can understand this.