This is accurate as they claim nisbat to Bareilly shareef. The ones Shaykh Asrar has been referencing have nothing to do with Bareilly shareef. For example, we have videos of stupid mureeds dancing in front of their pir, TUQ. Deobandis call TUQ a Bareilvi when the fact is that he has nothing to do with Ala Hazrat. TUQ calls himself a Qadri, not a Bareilvi or Razavi. Just like Deobandis do he used blanket Bareilvi to address all Sunnis (including the fakes) of the subcontinent when these people he was referencing weren't Bareilvi nor Razavi. As a matter of fact Shaykh Asrar does not like to put Bareilvi or Razavi against his own name even though he is a subcontinent Sunni, so why does he want to use a blanket Bareilvi for all the non deobandi population? Sticking to this logic even though incorrect it would still have been more accurate to use the term Asraris when addressing these people as both don't associate with being Bareilvi or Razavi. And then when mufti Qasim Sahib met with him and they uploaded the video of the same we can see Mufti Sahib stating something in the lines of (referring to Shaykh Asrar) "Yeh Sunni Razavi hai". So are we saying he has now become a Razavi? For those in the UK that aren't aware in India a huge amount of Hindus also visit the shrines of Awliya. Can we also brandish them as being Bareilvis if they do not know the etiquette of what to do and not to do at the mazaar? Please note I have not taken any personal issue with Shaykh Asrar whom I respect as a Sunni alim who is doing a lot of good for the Sunni cause Alhamdulillah. Just a criticism of the unfair association of deviencies and innovations with the name of Ala Hazrat, which is unfair as Ala Hazrat was the breaker of innovations. And just to point out there are much worse deviencies and innovations than doing tawaf of graves, such as the heresies of the Wahhabiyyah and Deobandis!