jazak Allahu khayra for pointing that out. it's pertinent and unfortunately, totally escaped me. i was too fixated on his euphemism using childish "smartness". it only looks cute and lovable when a child says "baba i didn't have 2 ice-creams, i only had one chocobar and one sundae" it's annoying, funny, and pathetic, when americans call drunkards/alcoholics as "problem drinkers" it's unacceptable evidence in court and a thorough joke if a lawyer would say "your honor, my client didn't lie under oath. he only produced false speech!" ... it warrants a punch in the jaw when a devbandi says these kind of things insulting the creed of the Ahlus Sunnah and the intelligence of people. remember the last time this same specimen translated "mar ke mitti mein milna" as "come into contact with soil"... might fool some 2nd or 3rd gen foreign desis not aware of the language, but for native speakers...
extremely shameless scoundrel. in his blind devotion to 3rd rate devbandi maulvis, the wretch didn't realise that "produce" is a synonym of "create". thus, if he says that Allah's speech was "produced", he openly admits that he is a mutazili. "produce a lie" - where? in Divine Speech? then zameel should proudly change his name to zameel mutazili. here onwards, we refer to this agent of mutazilis by his true name. if not, what is the point of his verbose posts?
this pathetic specimen seems to have only one aim in life - to try to unsuccessfully prove that the lord he supposedly worships can lie, and then to use pathetic euphemisms for his heresies https://barelwism.wordpress.com/202...ted-shaykh-al-hinds-juhd-al-muqill/#more-5149 question to zameel - according to your screed, it's a divine attribute, so why use these kind of silly, childish, euphemisms? why can't you directly say "LIE" directly? that's like someone trying to say zameel isn't the sharpest tool in the shed, when he can just say zameel is a jahil and ahmaq.
