An Open Secret

Discussion in 'Bibliophile's Corner' started by sunnistudent, Jul 5, 2010.

Draft saved Draft deleted
  1. sunnistudent

    sunnistudent Veteran

    You are correct.

    The original work in Urdu was not written by any scholar who graduated from any islamic madarsa.

    English translation was done by Dr Haq ( MS, eye surgeon).

    But to say that this rumour which is spread ( that ala hazrat studied with maulci ashraf ali thanvi) should not be refuted, is not correct.


    'O believers! If any disobedient comes to you with any news make a strict inquiry lest you may hurt any people improperly then remain repenting on what you have done. ( 49: 6)


    Hence this distortion in historical fact needed to be refuted.

    Some times great historical lie causes deep confusuion among muslim.

    For example :

    Shaykh Rashid Gangohi, who is called ‘Imam e Rabbani” by the Deobandis, said

    “ Guru Nanak was the “Khalifah ”[student] of Fariduddeen ganj shakar[ rh] . Since he used to be in the state of ecstasy, muslims did not pay attention to him “
    [ Tazkiratur Rashid ]

    This is such a big lie that any lay person can check and see the truth. Baba Fariduddeen Ganj Sahakr [ Radi Allahu taa’la] was born in 1175 CE and died in 1263 CE. Guru Nank , the founder of Sikh religion was born in 1469 CE and died in 1539 CE. There can not be any meeting between these two person ! But the deobandis are so full with love for their “imam e rabbani’ that , they accept this lie to be a fact and still publish that lie in their book !


    It can be read here:

    http://www.falaah.co.uk/refutation/wahabi/111-fazle-rasul-badayuni-and-deobandi-methodology-.html
     
  2. citizen

    citizen New Member

    I hope it wasn't a scholar who wrote this, cos they have better things to do than write this.
     
  3. sunnistudent

    sunnistudent Veteran

Share This Page