The issues of Iman e Abu Talib is mukhtalaf fihi and not an ijma'i mas'ala whereas Nanotwi's kufr is mujma 'alayhi, ijma'i qati`i.. On Isma`il Dehlwi, there was shubha fil mutakallim which is why A'lahazrat refrained from takfir. Yes he said Isma'il Dehlwi was in kufr fiqhi (see Fatawa Ridawiyya Sharif 6:90, qadeem). Whereas Nanotwi has hukm of kufr iltizami (kalami) on him.
What terrible examples. 1. Comparing Abu Talib issue to Nanotwi! 2. Comparing Ismayil issue of luzum/iltizam to Nanotwi! 3. Issue of Khidr عليه السلام to Nanotwi! I'm shocked that a graduate is actually giving such examples. None of the 3 above have any comparison to the ijmayi kufr of Nanotwi. I don't get this blind following. If Karam Shah sahib said whatever he said, why can't you use your own brain and look at the matter? These people should answer: what do YOU make of Nanotwi's 3 passages?
