Shab bāshī - spending the night

yes. for brothers who don't know the meaning of the term 'shab baashi' - it is a rather broad term which is used as a euphemism - unlike the explicit term used by this shaytan:

 

The crux of the matter is the deos refuse to entertain objectivity whether that is in relation to the works of their elders or their opponent. This Abu Haleem is more crude and drenched in hatred than the shameless Uthsman (bringing shame on a beautiful name)
I now laugh at their quibbling and anger when Shaykh Asrar brought their intellectual capacity into question, when clearly their lack of intellectual credability and objectivity is no longer in question. In an era of cults the deos might yet still set the same shameless standard

 

as for mr.devbandi's holier-than-thou outburst on talking about parents etc. and making a scene about alahazrat's use of a rather demure word 'shab-bashi', i advise him to please look up deo literature for their treatment of such subjects. hope he has some advice for qasim nanotvi, who examines in this topic in detail his aab e Hayaat. but of course, zameel-e-shaytan will drop from somewhere to justify the most outrageous things devs say, but vilify harmless words said by sunnis. also in cases where both parties have said the same thing (such as the tuu issue), devs vilify sunnis, all the while sitting on a high horse praising the usage of their own elders. la Hawla wa la quwwata illa billah.

download qasim's work here:
https://archive.org/download/Aab-e-...ab-e-HayatByShaykhMuhammadQasimNanotvir.a.pdf

1323 edition here: https://archive.org/details/AabEHayatByMolanaQasimNanotvi

====
while thanawi said that the life of nabiy sallAllahu alayhi wa sallam is 'barzakhiyah', khalil flatly refused it in his muhannad. so deos can have a version for the right occasion. and of course, have a middle-ground to link both: "duniyawiyyah-barzakhiyyah" the left-right, the whitest-black.

they try hard to be vague and equivocating - so they can jump over to either side as the occasion demands.

 

aHmaqon ki kami nahin ghalib
kitne saare to devband hi meiN hain

----
imam muhammad ibn abdu'l baqi al-zurqani is famous for his sharh of mawahib al-ladunniyyah of imam al-qaSTallani.
he born in 1055 AH and passed away in 1122 AH. his father is the famous maliki scholar, imam abdul Baqi ibn yusuf al-zurqani, the exegete of mukhtaSar al-khalil. among the works of al-zurqani (the son) are: anwar kawakib nahj al-salik sh. muwaTTa' imam malik and sharh al-bayquniyah.

this devvie says that imam zurqani did not say it anywhere. but it can be found in the sharh al-mawahib, v.8 p.358 as shown below. (aqdas had already posted but here is a screenshot of the printed page).

now will he retract? and apologise? (don't hold your breath...)

but there are other mistakes. the devbandi says that they believe in the lives of prophets after their passing. but thanawi said that their lives are 'barzakhiyah'. this has led to an internal disagreement with devs, calling hayati and mamati devs, even though all of them are soulless beings.

notice in the snippet, i have posted from zurqani, that imam subki said (and zurqani affirmed) that their lives are 'haqiqiyah', real, and not just figurative.

also note that alahazrat's statement from al-malfuz speaks in respectful tone, unlike the 'explanation' by the filthy deobandi which are from his own mind - not found in al-malfuz.

zurqani:




thanawi in hifzul iman:




malfuz of alahazrat, dawate islami ed. p.362

 

I think is about time that sheikh Asrar Rashid makes a video exposing these deobandi liars ... he's been rather quiet recently...

 

around 3:00 minutes he makes an analogy about parents etc. - that is the stupidest thing I have heard in many days.

----

If this chap is lucky enough, one day he will read the Qur'an and if his luck holds out a bit longer, he might even chance upon a book of hadith, and then he will swoon and will have to be carried out to the hospital - "Tch, tch ... nervous shock" the doctor will pronounce.

---

Aren't there even half a penny's worth of sensible people in their sect?