Shaykh Zulfiqar Naqshbandi / Abuse Allegations Fatawa

Discussion in 'Refutation' started by AR Ahmed, Jan 1, 2020.

Draft saved Draft deleted
  1. AR Ahmed

    AR Ahmed Well-Known Member

    Speaking from experience the muridin and khulafa of this Zulfiqar Ahmed are all wretched and evil in behavior and in aqida.
    Last edited: Jan 1, 2020
  2. Noori

    Noori Senior Moderator

    Zulfiqar Naqshbandi is a shameless liar, I have seen his books and listen to his audios a few years back. listen to this blatant lie at 18:35, he claimed that "brailvies believe in that "huzur ka ilm e ghayb zaati hay kulli hay", the entire audio is full of nonsense.

    In his book "Ulama e Deoband ka Tareekhi Pasmanzar" he changes the history without any reference

    Snap 2019-12-31 at 10.40.46.png
    as if Pishawar was the headquarter of the British rule not Dehli
    Snap 2019-12-31 at 10.42.24.png
    syed ahmed was murdered in tahajud prayer, then ismail dehlavi fought with the English army and was killed four days later. does any doebandi have any reference for all this new history?
  3. FaqirHaider

    FaqirHaider اللَه المقدر والعالم شؤون لا تكثر لهمك ما قدر يكون

    His "Naqshabdi" strand is rather vast and unfortunately they have the youth attracted, and propagate for them as they come off as hanafi sunnis, and the youth know no better , and when you try to reason to them, their have already been affected by the "tawwajuh (istidraj)" and experienced the kafiyaat around their murshids to cloud any judgement on reason alone. A few friends of mine fell into their grips, they essentially act or behave like us sunni (Brelwis) with themselves but quote the Akabireen, even one of Zulfiqar's khulafa , whom I sat with a few times to investigate their ways , met and greeted, and had my friend ask him about his opinion of the Sunni - Deo polemics. What was revealed to me through him was that his shaykh , held basically Brelwi views , disagreed to the Akabireens statements ,, but only in a dismissive manner he didn't call it kufr or them kafirs (unless I misunderstood him). Basically they operate in this manner, they reconcile among the students initiated in their way by saying they studied under both and we just do what Imam Rabbani writes etc, and not focus on these issues.

    That being aside the refutation these mureeds are making, are amateurish especially for mureeds, since they loose faith on "heresay" and unconfirmed statments directly, the "classic" mind trick card can be played on every tariqah , be it true or not. Have orientalist look at tariqah and its history and salafis and they are quick to label it all cult and brainwashing (justly and unjustly). The higher up mureed or those who stick to Zulfiqar at least have read book of how to be mureed, and those points of contention are found in those books.

    The irony of the fatwa is that those points of contention in the fatwa 38, many of them valid concerns while others can be found similar in sufi text which these "salafi-deobandi's claimed to believe in order to concoct their sufi identity."

    But I am rather pleased with the unveiling of such shenanigans, as such Zulfiqari Deobandi mureeds would pride themselves and think their way as pure and free from anti-shari behaviors. Some of them even held contempt for my Tariqah (haqqani), now I can retort and say well you're shaykh has rather outdone mine by miles.
  4. abu nibras

    abu nibras Staff Member

    Attached Files:

Share This Page