The Ahbash refuted in the UK

That's fair enough.

 

Just to be clear, I never said there are multiple faithful students of Shaykh Abdullah Harari. I mentioned one person I know personally who studied with him. That’s it. I don’t know how many others there are, and I never claimed to.


This individual told me directly, in person, that he has no connection whatsoever with the Ahbash, has kept his distance from them, and has already disavowed the book I mentioned, along with any other writings that contain problematic content. His Aqida is sound, and there’s no ambiguity about where he stands. I’m simply passing that on.

 

Then it's incumbent on his 'faithful students' to come out and disavow such works.

 

I know someone personally who was a student of Sh Abdullah Harari

he mentions that the books attributed to him, especially those with deviances in them ie such as attributing Masiyat Haqeeqi to Rasool Allah ﷺ, aliyadhubillah, are not written by him personally, but by those who surrounded him and claimed to be his students
Many of these are Shias masquerading as Sunnis in order to harm the deen from within,
Even the prominent publishing houses are run by them such that they can and have manipulated books and texts to suit their own purposes

 

Unfortunately, it appears that even Shah Turab al-Haq was taken in by Harari. In this clip, he refers to him as Bohut Barey Shaykh, Hazrat Allamah Shaykh al-Hadith Abdullah Harari.

It makes one wonder—how many more of our ‘Ulama fell for Harari’s deception?

 

Thank you for sharing

 

Ahbash takfir people for using a statement which was used and supported by many scholars such as Ahmad ibn Hanbal, ibn al Mubarak, al Haytami, Ali al-Qari, al Asbahani.

 

This is the book they allege to use

They call it the "Summary of At-Tabsir Fid-Din by Abul-Mudhaffar Al-Isfarayini."

 

They probably edited things from the quoted book as to suit their own agenda.

Note at 27:50, this individual in the video brings the usual ghayr muqalid trope of using " إذا صح الحديث فهو مذهبي"

 

Came across this:

 

Why don't you share some examples of these so called silly objections and pathetic reasoning from the sheikh?

 

ha ha.

'level of knowledge' is visible in their expression - or manifestation of that knowledge in books. when you read harariyy's books, especially when he faults sunni ulama, you can only laugh at his silly objections and pathetic reasoning.

mufti shamsu'l huda sahib might not have known about harariy when he visited him - he must have been 'awed' by the propaganda that he was a hadith master, memorised 6 books of hadith etc and took it on face value. you cannot hold his husn-zann against him. 20 years ago if someone took me to harariy and said that he refutes wahabis and celebrates mawlid; calls himself ash'ari and refutes ibn taymiyyah; calls himself shafiyi and claims to be a hadith master, i too would have been respectful - we are commanded to go by the exterior unless there is compelling evidence to the contrary.

---
having been long time students of hadith and related sciences - we have been fortunate to be able to dip into the treasure of high quality samples to measure people who call themselves hadith masters. regardless, even if harariyy WAS a hadith hafiz as he is claimed to be - mere memorisation of hadith or the qur'an does not make him ma'Sum, nor give him the authority to disparage sahabah or impute fisq to them.

isn't it ironical that someone who claims to have memorised hadith is supposed to be untouchable - and he can speak lightly of those who actually met, sat and took from the Prophet sallAllahu alayhi wa sallam directly? this is why i call the ahbash as morons who cannot understand even simple things.

 

Possible reply by some fools (specially devbandis) - you guys are the same with your Imam Ahmad Raza!

Our reply - show us where Imam Ahmad Raza has been irreverent to the lofty status of the Prophet 3alaihis salam or the Ahle Bayt or sahaba ridwan Allahu 3alaihim ajma3een!

Or even awliyaa and imams!

Where have his academic disagreements within the parameters of Ahlus Sunnah aqidah violated the zaruriyat of Ahlus Sunnah?

Show us where have his followers set out to prove him right at the expense of reverence to other imams with valid and acceptable but mukhtalif rulings within Ahlus Sunnah?

For your cult masters we can easily show their irreverence as well as your superblind following of your cult masters at the expense of reverence to the elders of the ummah. Imams Bukhari, Busiri, Ghazali, Suyuti, nay even sahaba can do 'huge mistakes' but Allah forbid if harari or iran shah or paqs or zahid shah, or ibn uthaymeen or thanwi mardood commit even a lapse!

 

Of course I am not expecting you or your cult master Abdullah harari to know the level of the sahabi Sayyiduna Ameer Mu3awiyah's (radi Allahu 3anhu) knowledge or status!

This is the problem with all you nonsunni cults, be it you guys or devbandis or wahabis or tafzilis and closet rawafid following that mardood paqs and iran shah or anyone else

you idiots think your cult masters are above and beyond any errors but the most exalted creations like Allah's Prophets and their companions can be badmouthed with ease under the false pretext of objective analysis and honest reporting... you guys are all just like the israeli media

 

This is true mufti shamsul huda misbahi took from and was given ijaazah by sheikh ^Abdullaah رحمه الله.

 

Of course I am not expecting you to know the level of sheikh ^Abdullaah's knowledge or status.

For that you or anyone else just need to approach your top scholar mufti shamsul huda misbahi and ask him when he met sheikh ^Abdullaah.

He was like a child in front of the sheikh. At awe at his level of knowledge. He took from sheikh ^Abdullaah and was granted ijaazah.

Till this day mufti shamsul huda misbahi gives ijaazah through the root of sheikh ^Abdullaah.

 

so you guys bring in lineage when it suits you?

what about your badmouthing of sahaba, and also takfir/tabdee3 of others with direct Sayyid/Hashmi lineage? does lineage matter only when validating your cult?

/* waits for him to narrate fantastic dreams and harari's 'karamah' when he walked on water! */

 

read his books and you will realise all of the above are just claims. and even if they were true, it means nothing for a mubtadiy. besides, looking at his books one gets an impression that these are written by someone who didn't even complete his studies! let alone someone they claim to have hadith knowledge.

ibn taymiyyah - whom you guys do takfir - was far greater in knowledge of hadith than your entire motley crew of fools put together can ever dream to be. but you still do takfir of him.

 

قوله تعالى : إن الله يأمركم أن تعدوا الأمنت إلى أهلها وإذا حكمتم بين الناس أن تحكموا بالعدل.
4:58

The asbaab al nuzool of this verse was in regard to the key of the k^abah. The key was then passed onto shaiybah and remains to this day in their offspring. Sidaanah al k^abah from its opening, closing to its cleaning.

Can you boast about this kind of honour in your lineage?

Sheikh ^Abdullaah al shaiybiyy al ^abdariyy was from the quraish whose lineage meets with the lineage of the Prophet عليه الصلاة والسلام. He was from banu shaiybah a sub tribe of the quraish.

The sheikh رحمه الله memorized the Quraan at the age of 9 or 10. He memorized the 6 books of hadith at the age of about 18. He has hundreds of sanads. An expert in many sciences.

Nasaban, ^ilman, ^amalan, zuhd, taqwaa and much more. He was superior to what you will ever be in every sense!

 

Has Mufti Shams ul Huda Khan Misbahi distanced himself from the Ahbash? There was a Ijaza that Mufti Sahib had granted to a Alim a few months ago with Harari's name on it.