'Allamah Sayyid Ahmad Sa'id Kazimi, radiyAllahu ta'ala 'anhu wa ardahu 'anna. What a splendid analysis indeed! Brief yet meaningful leaving no room for rawafid interpretations/fairy tales. In addition, the supposed pillars of the rawafid religion are the quran and ahl-e-bait about whom Rasul Allah - sallallahu ta'ala 'alaihi wa alihi wa sallam - said that if one were to cling to them ["it" videlicet some narrations] then one would evade misguidance. Upon this, we ask: [1] What "third guidance" do the rawafid wish to devise when they are extremely lacking in the "first two" anyhow i.e. 'aqidah of tahrif-e-quran and rejecting imamat within ahl-e-bait whilst affirming it for 12 only - and that too in Imam Husayn's lineage only excluding Imam Hasan's progeny; radiyAllahu ta'ala 'anhum ajma'in? [2] Moreover, if the "first two" are sufficient for guidance, what is the meaning and wisdom for a new "third guidance"? A befitting description of the rawafid indeed: when Allah takes 'aql, stupidity prevails. jazak Allah for that and keep them coming Aqdas.
the rawafiD concoct all sorts of lies regarding this hadith but ahlu's sunnah have understood its true explanation:
