Ibriz of Ad-Dabbagh

Salamun 'Alaykum

It is like this person has insultied my grandfather. Excercise taqwa!
To defend my grand shiekh is a must upon me, i do not mean to be argumentative, in fact i will not be.

The fact of kashf is not upon the choice of the one who expierences it, rather, it is something decreed solely by Allah. Allah gave gowth ul zaman that expeirence so he could rebuke his student. It is not if he was perverting, nor did he have any choice on being there, nor desire to watch such a thing.

We believe that Allah sees everything we do, His sight is unlimited, whereas the Shaykhs is limited. This is something that should ring loud with you in numerous ways, a point with many angles, and i say no further, nor suggest any words of kufr. Tackle the premise however you wish, but becareful.

 

ou of respect for Madinah... i hav 2 question this ...what u mean?

 

abu sounded like somebody ... made that clear ...u should un ban the dude and see what he has to say ... sure he is very VEXED right now

 

I asked, "Are you abu ibraheem?"

 

whatever dude ... the guy i know is not called abu ibraheem ... i told u that thru pm ... all i said it sounds like him and says the same things... it was you that staretd to ask me about abu ibraheem ...

 

I never asked you to contact him. You told me you knew him. You said that openly here in the forums as well. In one place you are saying abu ibraheem is 'para', in another place you are saying you do not know him.

So in conclusion you openly lie too?

 

fine think what u want ... paranoid freak !!

 

it was you that started to pester me for his details ... asking how to contact him ... i do not know any abu ibraheem...

 

Why are you playing hidden games here?

 

who died and made you coloumbo... we have things called i.p addresses sherlock

 

mabdullah why did you delete AI?

"u are soundin para like AI", that is what you said originally, why these hidden games?

 

There is nothing wrong in being a dog of Madina, beautiful Madina, my friend mabdullah (abu ibraheem)

 

haha, what a funny post. 'heavy probabilities'? hahaha
However, as everyone can see Lahori is a 'besharam' wahabi youngster

 

pfft how can you even mention dogs and Madinah in the same sentence... you have some nerve!!!

 

Salam aleykum

In my opinion, there are heavy probablities these two names belong to the same person...

As for lions not answering to Dogs, that is very non courageous...

Specially when many Sufi desire to be Dogs of Madinah...

Yet when someone cannot stand the quotes of Sufi books, then just insult opponents...

And the arabic version is available here:

http://www.dahsha.com/uploads/AlIbreez.pdf

 

lol.... u are soundin para like ...

 

So Lahori is abu alqamah after all

 

Salam aleykum

P 169, another student of Ad-Dabbagh tells the so called Karamat of Ad-Dabbagh:

“Then Sayyidi ‘Ali said: ‘Another one is that the Shaykh- Gob be pleased with him- described to me my wife from head to foot, limb by limb, the parts of her that are visible and the parts that are hidden, and his description was exactly as she is, with nothing added and nothing left out –God be pleased with him! Had I myself been charged with giving a description of her, I couldn’t have described her as well as he did- God be pleased with him! By God, had she been standing in front of him, he couldn’t have been more knowledgeable about her.”

P 170: Another so called Karamat

“Another one is that I was a man who indulged in much amorous play with my wife and I thought up numerous variations of amorous play with her. I mentioned some of this to a close friend among the brethren and he mentioned it to the Shaykh- God be pleased with him- in a manner of someone who reproached me. At that the Shaykh –God be pleased with him- laughed and said: “He has only told you some of the things he does. There’s more than that. In fact, he does such and such, and this thing and the other!” And he told him everything I was wont to do- and this while I was listening. Now there was no person who could have revealed this to anyone, indeed nobody knew about it except God the Sublime.”

P 174, there is the story of another student:

“And another one is that Sayyidi ‘Abd al-Rahman said: “I set out with the intention of visiting the Shaykh, and when I’d seated myself in front of him, he said to me: ‘What was that you were doing Saturday night?’ I replied: ‘O Sayyidi, what do you mean?’ He said: ‘You had intercourse with your wife, but you sat your infant son on the pillow when he wouldn’t go to sleep and the lamp was on top of the chest! Or didn’t you know that I was there with you.’”

The next question is:

Is it permissible in the Shari'ah of Saydul Mursaleen to describe women limb by limb and hidden parts?

Is it OK in the sacred laws to be with the murid on the night of wedding?

 

salam... interesting discourse ...