So when he's asked for evidence of his claim that significant preachers consider it kufr if someone doesn't believe the Prophet salallahu alayhi wassalam is Mukhtar i Kull, he presents an article that doesn't prove that at all. Imam Ahmad Rida didn't do takfeer on this basis, so he's just making up a lie. Takfeer on this basis is to be found nowhere in that article. Rather, many of the deos will consider this belief to be shirk so who is the real takfeeri?
It seems the backlash Hasan Ali got and the critcism of his kufri madhab has triggered a chain response from Deobandis 1657417107863384064 is not a valid tweet id
This Deobandi khabith is at it again, can someone drop a thread on his head? 1657120251836788737 is not a valid tweet id
this guy is a shameless donkey. his akabireen made their kufr donkey statement precisely because they thought everything is shirk, and were imagining it existed everywhere, even in a normal Muslim's namaz! he's just outed devbandis as closet wahabis!
I would recommend posting screenshots instead of direct links to Twitter since these Devbandis are notorious for deleting their tweets
Hamza Maqbul, the Deobandit who said the Donkey Statement is an “idea which is universally accepted”, throws his hat in. 1656808183124377600 is not a valid tweet id
brother, his wahabi overlords also cited Hazrat Abu Bakr's radi Allahu 3anhu quote: من كان يعبد محمدًا، فإن محمدًا قد مات، ومن كان يعبد الله، فإن الله حيّ لا يموت Please add the sharh and the context of that to the same thread, especially hazrat Abu Bakr's kissing the Prophet 3alaihis salam and the fiqhi permission extracted from this to kiss one's deceased near and dear ones.
i encourage bros to follow my thread. for a long time i alwasy wanted to refute this. am typing it online - if a brother can jsut start another thread and post all those tweets as a post, it will be in one place.
